[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
If you fancy a flutter on the all-Beatles Top 10 thing, or whatever, then maybe the second week in July would be a good one to go for - plenty of time for an iTunes-y announcement and July 6th is the 50th anniversary of Lennon meeting McCartney. (sez the Interwebs).

God only knows why I was thinking about that last night.

Date: 2007-04-27 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
WHAT.

Is this atrocity pencilled in to actually happen?

It was bad enough with Elvis! At least Miss Ciara saved us, then.

Date: 2007-04-27 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
And I LIKE Elvis.

Also Tom did u get my email?

Date: 2007-04-27 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
I think we need to start thinking of ways to prevent this, they must be stopped AT ALL COSTS. God. This makes me angry! We need to bus in some super-mega-famous popstar to make an exclusive and awesome track, maybe get Madonna to release her collaboration with Justin six months ahead of schedule.

Date: 2007-04-27 10:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bengraham.livejournal.com
Latest news sez Arctic Munkees will have 18 tracks in this week's top 200!

Date: 2007-04-27 10:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
That was an admin error, it was in our werk news round-up. The album tracks were classified as a compilation instead of an album, so each track counted separately or something - they're gonna ignore it.

Date: 2007-04-27 10:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com
i think they'll be pushed to get a WHOLE top ten, shurely? a belated number one for penny lane would be acceptable, but i just don't believe that there are ppl who need to buy the beatles off of itunes...

Date: 2007-04-27 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strange-powers.livejournal.com
I'm sure that some people will download Beatles songs in some vain, Noel Gallagher-esque fit of fake devotion, but it remains true that The Beatles are the archetypal great pop act and poptimists everywhere should beg and scrape at their feet. Well, the ones who are alive. Do the checklist:

1) Proper boy-band
2) Haircuts upset the parents
3) Made girls feel funny 'downstairs'. And some boys too.
4) Dressed up
5) Spanned bouncy dance pop, classy ballads and weird semi-comedy. And then the guitars...
6) Inexorable will they/won't they break up
7) Inadvisable merchandising/cartoon spin-offs

I'm no slave to received wisdom - this is the heart of all pop. So what's wrong - that it's old? White? Not good enough. It's still fit for pop purposes, and that's my only criteria.

Date: 2007-04-27 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
The Beatles are the archetypal great pop act

WHAT HERESY IS THIS?? Men have been burnt at the stake for less.

Even when I'm being reasonable about this The Beatles are ALSO the archetypal 'turn our back on pop pap for serious arty rock stuff' act; the archetypal 'boys with guitars' act etc. etc.

Date: 2007-04-27 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strange-powers.livejournal.com
I'd argue that 'turn our back on pop pap for serious arty rock stuff' is an essential penultimate phase for any pop artists with longevity, and loads of true pop heroes (Prince and Madonna for example) have descended into this madness. Not always emerging from it, either. The Beatles arty rock stuff is WAY more pop-friendly than than most of the content of this week's chart.

And they couldn't help being boys with guitars - that is what was pop in those days, unless you were just singers. They couldn't exactly break out the synths. But as soon as the technology was out there, they started using it and stayed at the forefront and kept surprising people.

Date: 2007-04-27 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
The fact that this is all true is why so many people around here resent them.

Date: 2007-04-27 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dickmalone.livejournal.com
OK, let's assume they went arty with Revolver. Their albums from there go:

Revolver 1966
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 1967
Magical Mystery Tour 1967
The Beatles (The White Album) 1968 (2 disc)
Yellow Submarine 1969
Abbey Road 1969
Let It Be 1970

One of these is a cartoon and two of the others were TV specials! Just sayin. They put up a good front of being arty but they still did lots of ur-pop things.

Date: 2007-04-27 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strange-powers.livejournal.com
The problem here is - as you suggest - with the charts rather than the Fab Four. But if most people are downloading Lionel Dendingfield (http://strange-powers.livejournal.com/57164.html) this week, and next week it's McFly, and then The Beatles... shouldn't the charts reflect that? I'm certain that the charts have only infrequently been any good at showing us the new, and increasingly showing us what was new a month ago. Why not half a century?

Date: 2007-04-27 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Tom, I sent you an email regarding canon...However mein email is rather unreliable so basically it should say: I r too busy to do canon today.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 08:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios