provocative claims:
i. in science it means it is moved beyond by being proved wrong
ii. in art it means it is moved beyond by being established as the unspoken "condition of possibility"* for an artform/genre/field/discipline to persist in stand-alone quasi-perpetuity
*in quotes bcz frank distrusts this phrase (and bcz i only have a very hand-wavey idea what i mean by it)
i. in science it means it is moved beyond by being proved wrong
ii. in art it means it is moved beyond by being established as the unspoken "condition of possibility"* for an artform/genre/field/discipline to persist in stand-alone quasi-perpetuity
*in quotes bcz frank distrusts this phrase (and bcz i only have a very hand-wavey idea what i mean by it)
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 05:12 pm (UTC)But I'm glad this qn has its own thread, because I also want to know how ideas are completed.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 06:05 pm (UTC)an old fact proved wrong is dissolved or dismantled, not completed, surely.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 07:22 pm (UTC)an idea (call it A) is "completed" when A and not-A are split from one another socially, and continue their careers in different (and possibly incommensurable) zones of enquiry
in science, being proved wrong means that A is cast out into the zone (or rather, the incoherent cluster of zones) that is non-science, while not-A is built into the fabric of science (as latour argues)*
in art, the split (by contrast) not into art and non-art, but -- as noted above -- into rival artforms/genres/fields/disciplines, which define themselves against one another
(obviously what i'm doing here is trying to define the idea of completion so as to make a distinction bewtween how ART treat ideas and how SCIENCE treats ideas)
*so what is being completed is not so much the "idea" as the arc of the story in which A and not-A still circle one (within a given terrain) another vying for love
no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-25 10:16 pm (UTC)ie "it is moved beyond, by us" = "we have moved beyond it"
(it is not an elegant sentence)