[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=122193692

Popworld Pulp, launching in a couple of weeks as a new music WEEKLY (v bold).

Looking at its MySpace it doesn't seem to be offering anything hugely compelling though.

Does anyone here still buy print music media, out of interest?

Date: 2007-03-29 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
OMM is dreadful. The actual content level is minimal, I can't remember being interested or entertained by ANYTHING in the last issue I read, even the "MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE FANS" feature was k-limp and missed some great opportunities for good music writing. I just don't know why they bother.

Date: 2007-03-29 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com
I haven't read it for ages, to be honest but in the wasteland of utter boredom that is a dormitory village even Reading doesn't want to admit is part of it almost anything becomes really interesting, especially if the parents can be convinced to buy it because it is a newspaper etc.

Date: 2007-03-29 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com
It is shockingly poor, and still seems to be very confused as to what's it's supposed to be there for. I think it's a music magazine for people who don't listen to much music. (I have a vague feeling the same is true for their Food & Sport mags - I'm not much of a cook or a sports fan, but quite enjoy OSM & OFM - whereas I love music and find OMM pointless)

Date: 2007-03-29 11:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com
talk.guardian.co.uk regularly roasts OW. Still not seen a copy myself yet, mind./

Date: 2007-03-29 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] piratemoggy.livejournal.com
OWM is one of those things that, along with the annual NewStateswoman, (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/Grungemaiden/nswm.jpg) makes me curl up into a foetal position and try to work out whether I'm angry or just disappointed. :( And I've never even read a copy.

The point about OMM being very 'ooh hello we're MUSOS and you're not WOW' is true. I should probably reassess it now I have an internet connection.

Date: 2007-03-29 11:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
Ha true for me too - though I'm pretty confident that OSM is really good anyway, apart from making me interested in reading about sports I don't follow I'm also usually impressed with its tennis coverage. Speaking of which OSM is a MUST-BUY this weekend! Elena Dementieva is the cover star and the lead feature is all about RUSSIAN TENNIS OMGOMGOMG

Music To Eat

Date: 2007-03-29 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
So by analogy OFM's target = middle-class newcomers to hosting dinner parties? Or is that OMM's target? arf

Date: 2007-03-29 11:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenith.livejournal.com
There's also this total inability to not be po-faced, even when supposedly there are pieces in which try to be funny. It's like Q with slightly less obviously conservative politics. It taints everything that's covered in an issue, and when that approach maps onto acts who lean that way anyway - HELLO THE ARCADE FIRE* - the result is just snooze to the power of zzzzzz.

*Piece written by Paul Morley, unquestioning of the band's typical blathering about making music that means something not like all that shitty pop music, much in the manner of his U2 hagiography... I hope the money's good, at least.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 03:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios