[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
And now the votes from the [livejournal.com profile] poptasticuk jury.

"Everyone has chosen so well, I feel bad having to pick winners and losers. Well done Poptimists! The songs seem to me more varied than some of the past selections, which I was pleased about. Now I have a whole load of ace new music to listen to - thanks guys!

1. Bonnie And The Treasures - "Home Of The Brave". Nice Motown-y sound (certainly of that era), female vocals. I'm a big Motown fan but haven't mentioned that before so a good taste-prediction. 10th Place - LOSE - unflattering scoreline for [livejournal.com profile] martinskidmore.

2. Data Panik - "Cubis (I Love You)". Fun 80s/90s style, a bit shouty but only as necessary. Obviously British vocals (I'm guessing Scottish cos the girl reminds me of Manda Rin from Bis... is it her?), both male and female. Lots of different ace bits. This is great! 1st Place - WIN - [livejournal.com profile] lisa_go_blind goes top after busy performance.

3. Jorge Ben - "Taj Mahal". Weird but very jolly. Liking the nonsense lyrics, plenty of 'dedede's and 'lalala's. Not sure where it's from - could be Spanish or Eastern European, which is a pretty wide guess! Goes on a bit, though, and doesn't really go anywhere. 8th Place - LOSE - [livejournal.com profile] epicharmus lacks penetration in the final third.

4. Ooberman - "Blossoms Falling". Ooh, 90s post-PSB British boypop - ace! Sounds like a gay Blur. More great 'lalala's but other lyrics too so beats the last song by far. 2nd Place - WIN - journeyman squad play their socks off for [livejournal.com profile] skillextric.

5. Bananarama - "Doctor Love". Super-80s sounding electro-pop, quite sharp but nice girly 'woo' bits. Is it Bananarama? Either them or someone very similar. 11th Place - LOSE - [livejournal.com profile] jeff_worrell won't believe this scoreline.

6. Miranda! - "Una Lagrima Sobre el Telefono" Euro dance-pop! In foreign, most likely Eastern European. I like it - although it's not the absolute best of its genre it's better than the majority, which can get a bit mindlessly boshy at times. Would be good for a bit of 'big fish little fish'. 7th Place - LOSE - World Cup stars fail to produce for [livejournal.com profile] lockedintheatti.

7. Ben Watt ft Est'elle - "Pop A Cap In Your Ass". I was immediately put off by the length (3 mins over the optimum pop song duration!) but it's actually a cool, interesting song which I enjoyed listening to. A mix of slightly 90s-ish dance sounds and a girl with a London accent describing her shoplifting exploits. 4th Place - WIN - gamble pays off and [livejournal.com profile] inf0vore climbs out of relegation places.

8. Manu Chao - "Bongo Bong". The backing music is familiar but I don't recognise the singing. Oh, I just realised - Robbie Williams and Lily Allen covered it. I don't know this version, though, so you're safe. It's good, but could do with more singing and a little less speaky bit. 5th Place - WIN - [livejournal.com profile] koganbot scrapes a win.

9. Ingenting - "Slapp In Solen". Yay, someone found something Swedish! Lovely. Typical Swedish indie-pop, a bit like Håkan Hellström. 3rd Place - WIN - tried and true tactics kickstart [livejournal.com profile] blue_russian's season.

10. Of Montreal - "A Sentence Of Sorts In Kongsvinger". Very jolly, cute indie pop, funny lyrics about living in Norway! Some great 'papapa's and squelchy background noises. 6th Place - DRAW - [livejournal.com profile] piratemoggy's first point of the season - could easily have been all three.

11. Mott The Hoople - "Saturday Gigs". A ballad in a very British accent (a bit Bowie-ish), sounds quite 70s. Not what I'd normally listen to but it's enjoyable nonetheless. 9th Place - LOSE - ageing striker fails to perform and leaves [livejournal.com profile] byebyepride under pressure.

I can't believe I'm putting the one I presume to be Bananarama at the end, since they are pop legends, but it just shows how much I liked all of the songs.

Date: 2007-03-28 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
I also refer my learned friends to my earlier remarks on the follies of mistaking indie for pop! Actually one thing I am learning from the Championship is that my implicit assumption that everyone else has the same taste as, or even thinks about music in the same way as me and [livejournal.com profile] freakytigger, is way off-beam!

Indie vs. Pop

Date: 2007-03-28 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
I suspect that I have been just to stressed from work this week to think sensibility, but perhaps we could tease this out tomorrow, hm?

Re: Indie vs. Pop

Date: 2007-03-28 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
Perhaps I'll post something to try and explain tomorrow, and we could discuss it some more. Basically I don't mean that indie ISN'T also pop (in the broad sense) but that there is a particular indie ideology which a) applies indie attitudes to pop music (e.g. 'I'm into more obscure Scando-pop B-sides than you are') and / or b) actually claims to BE pop music (there is quite a specific genealogy of this which I think we have discussed somewhere, e.g. the moment when Creation records is inventing an alternative pop universe -- this is what pop would be like if the 70s had never happened).

re (b)

Date: 2007-03-28 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
paging nick lowe* surely**

*"pure pop for now people" as alt.title for "the jesus of cool"
**or possibly even greg shaw

Date: 2007-03-28 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
If I was going to be provocative - and hell, I think I will be - I'd argue that maybe the problem is yours: not being able to get past the twee in order to hear the pop.

I'd also argue, in provocation, that Data Panik and Of Montreal undoubtedly work both as indie and as pop - at least, these particular songs of theirs do - and there is no reason to pigeonhole them as one or t'other.

Date: 2007-03-28 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
there is a particular indie ideology which ... b) actually claims to BE pop music

Provoking further: but it is YOU in this case who is imposing this intention onto a song which you've never heard before. You are using other information to distort your reaction to the music. Contrast with the home player's reaction.

Date: 2007-03-28 04:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
Yes I am probably being unfair to [livejournal.com profile] poptasticuk who does describe things quite carefully as indie-pop, Euro-dance pop etc. But I probably have a different definition of pop from you, since I can't hear the 'pop' in Data Panik at all, and although I can hear all sorts of pop music being referred to in Of Montreal (and I actually quite enjoyed this one), I can't imagine this being anything like a hit. In fact there are elements -- the tinny drum machines, the puny voice, the kitschy references to pop musics past -- which militate against it being a hit in the current climate, and which it's hard not to read as an indie negation of the 'popular'.

sub (specie aeternitatis) pop

Date: 2007-03-28 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
if a chart falls outside time is it ordered?

Date: 2007-03-28 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
see, I was with you up to "...current climate", then you had to throw in an assumed intention again. This is completely irrelevant! It is in my pop world anyway. :)

Date: 2007-03-28 04:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
I don't think I'm talking about intention!

If we assume for the moment that we can separate the artwork from the social experience surrounding it, I think I can explain what I mean. I see an artwork as an assemblage of components. Each of these components is both formal and social. Each component on its own exerts a kind of social force, and the artwork as an assemblage of the various components exerts a kind of social force. This social force is not historically invariant, i.e. it is not independent of context and in different situations it might work in different ways (hence having to specify that an analysis is relative to a 'current climate'). These forces are ambiguous and hard to control -- they may appear to travel towards a closed rather than an open experience, but may always turn out to go the other way instead, as contexts keep getting scrambled. There's no a priori reason for assuming that indie is 'bad' or that pop is 'good'; but I think it's useful to distinguish the two, at least up to a point, and by indie I mean that I judge the lines of force to be travelling more towards closure than towards openness.

No intention here!

Date: 2007-03-28 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
(a less po-faced response)

I wish I was in your pop world, not mine. I don't like it in here much today :-(

Date: 2007-03-28 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
I'm happy to accept this is my problem not anyone else's!

I'm not using the pop / indie distinction to sort people into pigeonholes, I don't think (which would imply you could be one or the other, but not both, except in rare cases). Think of it more like: you have a piece of music. When we're talking about the open aspects of it (the things that mean it could be in the charts and played in the launderette when I go to pick up the washing later) we're thinking about its pop aspects. When we're talking about its closed aspects, i.e. the bits that can be fetishised, hoarded, turned into a competitive game about obscurity, we'd be talking about its indie aspects. Obviously a song can go back and forth

Look an actual example: e.g. White Town's Your Woman is obviously indie, but its pop potential was fully actualised, won't ever be totally diminished, but the more it gets forgotten from the public discourse of pop and becomes the sort of thing that fills out a 'top 50 one-hit wonders that were actually good' feature on Stylus, the more it returns to indie-dom.

So back to my problem: I guess I'm miffed because I think Saturday Gigs, which was/is HUGELY pop ought to STILL be pop, but clearly that side of it isn't discernible to people. Also I worry that there are people who hear the pop in twee / indie but won't hear it in the Lighthouse Family or Simply Red.

Date: 2007-03-28 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
I guess I'm miffed because I think Saturday Gigs, which was/is HUGELY pop ought to STILL be pop, but clearly that side of it isn't discernible to people.

THIS is certainly worthy of further discussion. (Although Mott is a bad example for me cos I've never really liked them.) But yes, a serious discussion of why certain 'older' forms of pop music do not cut ice with ver kids today is an interesting topic. Far more so than the other matters you raise.

I have just realised we do not share a common understanding of the term "indie". And I think I reject yours. Use other words please to refer to the closed aspects of music appreciation.

Date: 2007-03-28 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
what else does indie mean?

Date: 2007-03-28 04:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
Also: I am not claiming to not be indie.

Date: 2007-03-28 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
I do not presume to judge that anybody is indie (or not).

To the extent I use the word nowadays, it is nearly always as a convenient shorthand for the sound (production, instrumentation). Or to tease The Lex with.

Date: 2007-03-28 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
In that case we differ -- I'm still using it as a (possibly poor) word for something which can link the formal aspects of pop to their social context. Except about teasing the Lex ;-0

Date: 2007-03-28 06:15 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I too am having trouble with your use of the words "pop" and "indie." Indie contexts can be open and pop contexts can be closed, depending on the time and place. Also, it's crucial that you say more about what you mean by "open." I thought the 1978 New York punk-postpunk-power-pop-avant-garde-fake-jazz-no-wave-etc. scene in New York, small and haughty and bitchy as it was, was wide open not just in what people were listening to (everything) but also in its ability to be surprised and moved and changed and distressed and excited and hurt by music, and in its sense of having no idea where it was going or what it was leading to. I thought in 1986 - now living in San Francisco, though that was beside the point because the scene had been internationalized - that the much much much much MUCH bigger indie-alternative-fanzine-&-music network, more "open-minded" than ever, taking in everything from hardcore punk to noise skronk to whatever pygmy music Op magazine was into at the moment, had lost a good deal of its ability to move or change or surprise or distress or hurt anything. My potent phrase was "all rendered lame in the context of our appreciation," and it seemed to me that we could easily incorporate hip-hop and bubblegum into our vortex of nothingness and be equally enthusiastic towards and unchanged by them as well. Anyway, I don't think I necessarily came up with a great explanation for what was causing the shutdown, and I still need help developing my ideas, but I don't think that "indie" should be the name for the shutdown, if for no other reasons than that I've experienced indie scenes that weren't shut down and that [livejournal.com profile] poptimists itself is an indie scene: discussions and shenanigans like ours aren't exactly taking place in Time magazine and Us Weekly, and they're not frequent on television (or at least weren't in 1998, when I last had one).

Date: 2007-03-28 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
Well this is the point in the argument where I usually fold and say I was just being sarcastic and negative BUT:

i) I agree with the idea that 'indie' and 'pop' don't necessarily align with 'open' and 'closed'. But the way I see the terms, 'pop' is a kind of ideal degree zero of openness, so everything ends up being some shade of indie. So my real point is maybe more about rhetoric, i.e. acknowledging owning up to being indie rather than pretending to be pop.

ii) I realise this is a rather negative strategy! I think it comes from the fact that when I say 'indie' I'm really talking about ME, from how I was like when I was a teenager and student -- so this would be a long story if I went into that. Because I don't see an 'alternative' to being indie, I understand it to mean both the turn against the world in which something like my identity is established, and the temptation to freeze the movement at that point. i.e. 'indie' is a necessary struggle against conformism, but also the name for a failure to see that that struggle has to dissolve itself: that there is really no such thing as conformism, which is the illusion that there is a world to struggle against.

iii) And yes I agree that there might be a problem with using that term without contextualising it in relation to personal history; and yes I agree that in (external) history, different scenes, different alternatives, have represented different kinds of vector of travel. And the other personal side of this would be having been part of the 'indie' scene in Edinburgh for a few years, and not being so now, owing to changes in my life, and what I feel are probably failures on my part. Having changed a real scene for a virtual one, I'm doing what I always do IRL, which is vacillate between self-imposed detachment / lack of engagement and open expressions of frustration which are at least as much meant for myself as for anyone else -- hence being constantly disappointed by the fact that [livejournal.com profile] poptimists doesn't feel open enough to me. (for which read: I'm not open enough to [livejournal.com profile] poptimists?)

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 11:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios