more pop filosophie: discuss

[blue-russian.livejournal.com]

We all read fluxblog, don't we? Yes, of course, we do. Matthew really seems to have raised his game over the last year or so, don't you think? Well, I just wanted to call people's attention to a post he updated yesterday. Somehow I would expect we'll all agree with his basic idea, if not about the specific example, although there's quite a bit too tease out.

I'll excerpt the relevant bit:

I'd like to address this comment left in the box below, which more or less echoes what I was railing against the last time I wrote about CSS at length:

I'm sure Lovefoxxx is not emoting that much. She's in a dance band for crying out loud and not a very good one. - Anon

To a certain extent this (obviously quite brave!) anonymous poster is entitled to their opinion, and since it is apparent that they haven't given this a great deal of thought, it's not really worth arguing with them, at least not in the interest of trying to change their mind. But honestly, there's no way I can read this sort of comment without assuming some pretty harsh things -- mainly, that they seem to have extremely rigid and unimaginative ideas about what signifies intelligent and emotionally moving art.

I think that a lot of the problem that some people run into with CSS is that their record is very much a product of the present tense, and though I believe that accounts for a great deal of its beauty, art that is so tied into a moment that will inevitably pass tends to freak out a certain type of insecure fan who demands permanence and timelessness, often because they are terrified of ever having to admit that they enjoyed something that has since become dated. If you want to cling to the notion of having an imagined aesthetic upper hand, you will most likely become allergic to this sort of music, and find refuge in safe bets. If you've conditioned yourself to think of contemporary culture (especially internet culture) as being an endless stream of vulgar novelty -- a notion that is not entirely inaccurate, by the way -- you've most likely blinded yourself to any art that speaks to the humanity and emotional truth of experiences within that culture.

Personally, I remember quite clearly a moment at uni when my roommate and I were questioning "Will we always like this music?" although for us I think it was a given that the music was timeless, and while it was we that would become dated.

Comments

[piratemoggy.livejournal.com]

I think it's the fact I think there was fun music before CSS and there will be afterwards and a lot of places seem to be suggesting that they just reinvented the idea of disco, when I see that as having been done before. It's not an anti-pop statement, it's a dislike of the way in which the music is dealt with. Rather than saying 'well this is quite ace' it seems to go for 'it's the second coming!!!1one!' when, to my ears, they sound a lot like a huge number of other things around at the minute. I dunno, I just don't think they're that great.

Mixmag was all over them for awhile. I think it was Mixmag, anyway, might have been something else one of my flatmates left in the bathroom and the NME goes mental every time Lovefoxx sneezes, as far as I can tell but I do only read it every six months or so. Various bits of stuff that fall out of newspapers have been drooling all over them, too, although I guess those aren't really music publications per se.

I find the Brazil thing vaguely patronising, more than anything else. Like, 'oh my god, someone in Brazil wrote a pop song' -surely not! Possibly this is a gross misinterpretation of what's going on and I by no means think it's what everyone who likes CSS thinks but I find it really quite annoying.

[freakytigger.livejournal.com]

a lot of places seem to be suggesting that they just reinvented the idea of disco

This is pretty much endemic every time you get a band with a beat I think! :(

[piratemoggy.livejournal.com]

Yeah. :( I don't think it's particular to CSS at all, it's just I heard them after about three months of articles etc. due to a total internet blackout so I tend to direct my rage about it at them.

someone in Brazil wrote a pop song

[blue-russian.livejournal.com]

i don't know if i go OMG but i certainly do find it interesting when people appropriate bits of a fairly different culture and make it their own. if we think "the internet makes us a chain of global villages la la la" then no, it's not surprising, but i still preserve no small degree of wonder and therefore joy at the idea of teenage girls in brazil liking Death From Above. i am sure no small portion of the US or Canada (never did figure out which DFA was being referred to) has no idea that they exist.

Re: someone in Brazil wrote a pop song

[piratemoggy.livejournal.com]

That's true, actually, I don't think I'd really approached it thinking about it like that before. I tend to have some kind of massive (and totally ridiculous/offensive to myself even when I actually think about it) reaction to a lot of stuff like that based on the fact I am an International Relations student and so spend a lot of my time being stupid about cultural imperialism vs cultural appropriation etc. See also: have read too much Eduardo Galeano in last week possibly.

On the other hand, there is the aspect that a lot of awesome Brazilian music that doesn't so heavily emulate music from these parts/the US doesn't get that kind of interest around it. Which is a shame, in my opinion, although I'll admit my knowledge of Brazilian music is highly limited.

Are the two DFAs not the same? I have been lied to. I thought Jesse Whatshisface was in both of them? Either him or the other one, Sebastien Whatshisfaceorwhateverhe'scalled. Blimey.

Re: someone in Brazil wrote a pop song

[pot80.livejournal.com]

No, James Murphy and DFA sued the Death From Above 1979 guys, made them alter the name -- hence the 1979 tag.

[zenith.livejournal.com]

the NME goes mental every time Lovefoxx sneezes, as far as I can tell but I do only read it every six months or so

I think I see a flaw in yr data methodology here...

[piratemoggy.livejournal.com]

Yeah, fair point.