[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
"quality, though it exists, is not a poptimist concern"

So sez [livejournal.com profile] jauntyalan - what say you?

(The Poptimist TFTDs will be drawn from that text poll I did last week about "Poptimist Tenets")

Date: 2007-03-06 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com
For me the ultimate horizon of poptimism is certainly one in which quality disappears. It is a necessary postulate but it is also absolutely impossible, and unliveable. Quality is not objective but this does not mean we can just throw it away, i.e. quality = value FOR something, and we can accept that there are different 'uses' for music, including the unusual aesthetic 'non-use' use. But a world without quality would be a world without uses, and things without quality would be things without any differentiation, ergo impossible to conceive of. For me, poptimism means flirting with the impossible possibility of this disappearance of quality. It is not an ethics (a way of living) because it is an experience of the impossibility of ethics (i.e. of venturing towards the disappearance of liveability as such).

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 05:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios