Digitalism

Mar. 6th, 2007 11:53 am
[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I will come clean right from the off and say that yes, this is background research for work. But I will just be absorbing the info myself and not giving any of it directly to THE MAN.

[Poll #940984]

I'm also rly interested in thoughts on digital music and its marketing and pricing in general, especially FORMAT - which appeal more to buyers? Single? Album? Either with lyrics/videos/art bundled up? Single plus a free B-Side? 4-song EP package? "Subscription" to new/work-in-progress artist tracks? (Much mooted this, rarely-actually done?) I get the feeling that the major labels' thinking is still VERY tied to what they're used to in terms of physical sales.

Anyway this is the future of pop distribution and access, so let's talk about it!

Re: Coincidence.

Date: 2007-03-06 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
Interesting. PRS money is for who exactly?

Capturing those myspace streams and bang! right into iTunes is great, isn't it?

Re: Coincidence.

Date: 2007-03-06 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
PRS money goes to the songwriters (eg Cathy Dennis) as opposed to the artist's slice (eg Kylie)

Grr I've got confused above about the Copyright Tribunal stuff - the figures should be percentages or something. No-one really understands what's going on with it, only that we're trying to settle out of court :-)

Re: Coincidence.

Date: 2007-03-06 04:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
urg, then where does the publisher money go? songwriter also?

you always hear how the people who actually make the money are the songwriters, and that breakdown (7 to Kylie, 1 to Cathy) suggests something different (Ringo gets 7/4p for playing drums on 'Let It Be', Paul gets only 0.5p for writing the song! (plus his 7/4p))

Re: Coincidence.

Date: 2007-03-06 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
The publisher money can go wherever the publisher sees fit! If a songwriting band member has an exceptionally good publishing deal (eg Radiohead) then they will see a fair bit of the publisher's slice as well as their artist slice, once they've paid their original publishing advance off. Alternatively the publisher will rub their hands with glee and buy an porsche.

Other non-digital royalty areas are EXTREMELY lucrative for songwriters. Kylie gets 0p for getting her song played on the radio/telly. Cathy Dennis gets £££many. Online stuff is handled differently - there are separate royalties for BUYING music (79p breakdown described above) and separate royalties for PERFORMING music (ie using Kylie song in the background for your website or myspace to encourage people to visit it). It's the latter bit that we're being sued about (apologies, I got mixed up earlier).

MCPS handles the Buying A Product side of things (CDs, DVDs), and this part of the music industry is going down the sh1tter. Sales of physical products are falling and there was no 'instant replacement' scheme for online royalties this time - unlike when CDs arrived and it was merely a matter of changing the shape of the case. It all works differently and the major labels are feeling the pinch because they didn't respond quickly enough.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 06:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios