Profile
Poptimists
Page Summary
freakytigger.livejournal.com - (no subject)
katstevens.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alexmacpherson.livejournal.com - (no subject)
infov0re.livejournal.com - (no subject)
katstevens.livejournal.com - 21 tick salute (off topic)
blue-russian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
freakytigger.livejournal.com - Hmmm
lockedintheatti.livejournal.com - I can't believe Madonna is getting shafted here
koganbot - (no subject)
friend-of-tofu.livejournal.com - (no subject)
awesomewells.livejournal.com - So...
lollers.livejournal.com - (no subject)
jeff-worrell.livejournal.com - Come on Britneh
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:17 am (UTC)Jackson vs Joy Division: The easiest of the four. Disco beats despair, as Joy Division's story proves anyway.
Missy vs Michael: Frank's comment last time about the anger and fear and wit and suchlike in Billie Jean convinced me that it was more than a warhorse, but I'm still voting for Missy.
Britney vs Pet Shops: Another fairly easy tick even though it's not my favourite PSB track (7th or 8th favourite single, maybe) - the discussion last time about "Are people just voting for Madonna because it's Madonna?" springs to mind, maybe I am just voting for the Pets because it's them, but they did and do mean an awful lot to me, and it's hard to separate the particular connections they made with me from the music.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:42 am (UTC)'Work It' is still better though. Would've ticked 'Billie Jean' over every other song today except 'Like A Prayer'.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:17 am (UTC)The first two fites are between evenly matched B+ songs. The last two fites are all A+++. I am sticking with Toxic over WEG though, the former being in my top ten pop songs of ALL TIME (WEG would probably make the top 25). Missy vs Jacko is too close to call musically so I went for the one with the better video.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:31 am (UTC)21 tick salute (off topic)
Date: 2007-02-15 11:26 am (UTC)*I will be listing only the Top 10 for each artist, but will link to the original poll.
Re: 21 tick salute (off topic)
Date: 2007-02-15 12:18 pm (UTC)Batdance: 15 votes
Money Don't Matter 2 Night: 9 votes
Scandalous.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:28 am (UTC)Case in point, "Toxic," which I know is quite good, but on some level I connected with WEG. And the, erm, emotion there wins me over. All Toxic had Britney was in a uniform. But maybe if I could listen to Toxic, because I WEG is certainly well-worn.
LWTUA is wonderful, but its stiffness is thrown into harsh relief going up against supple Michael and his fancy footwork.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:45 pm (UTC)Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 12:28 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 12:29 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:13 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:27 pm (UTC)(i feel really awkward discussing this because I have the suspicion I might offend someone by implying a sort of 'you don't really like what you like, you like it cos you're told to', but... you know, i was discussing memetic desire this morning! i think it's a good thing! let's not pretend we have more agency than we do, etc etc.)
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:43 pm (UTC)I was going to say 'not a factor at all' but accepted wisdom works in other ways too: the non-canonical drops out of circulation (whereas the canonical has had an extended life on the radio) so you get less exposure to it over the years.
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:48 pm (UTC)yes! this is a part of what I mean: when you are a mere bairn such as I, you learn about older records from e.g. capital gold and vh1 classic, as much as anything else. You hear a lot of great songs, things you love: while no doubt there's a load more of wonderful music out there, if it's not canonised and playlisted you'll never know about it. you make decisions on what you like from a much smaller remit than someone who's there at the time. And sometimes (obv i am straying from the fite at hand here) it's quite hard to tell whether you think something is 'any good at all' or whether you just recognise it.
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:22 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:29 pm (UTC)It's the problem with the tight demographic focus of NME now - Conor M knows who his readers are, and knows what they like, and knows that by catering to this he will acquire new readers who aspire to be like that. Whereas if nobody really knows what the audience is like there's a lot more at stake in trying to forge it (and successful forgeings are temporary, because there's no overall brand strategy behind things).
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:35 pm (UTC)I used to think Plan B was different but as soon as it found its niche it burrowed neatly into it.
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:56 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 03:02 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 03:06 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:59 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:44 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:49 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:17 pm (UTC)yes, and I think it's very possible that people can second-guess their own motives, think 'well i really like this now but maybe i'll stop loving it, whereas my opinions aren't going to change on [canonical song]'. it's not just grimey simey who doesn't want to turn out to have been 'wrong' in the past! on both a personal and a public level.
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:20 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:37 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:40 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:58 pm (UTC)I dislike the idea of calling it 'the poptimist canon' because to me the poptimist canon is this thing we're creating here, now, out of fites and polls and tickyboxes and shared mp3s and clubnights, something specific to a certain social group, to us. There are certain things which are held-in-common important to a lot of us, whose importance I've never really felt outside this group - the love of saint etienne that turned out to pervade ilm, for example. 'year 3000' is busted's best-loved song among other people I know, it gets a reaction like no other, but I don't think of it as the best-loved in the pmists lj community?
Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 02:59 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 03:10 pm (UTC)Re: Hmmm
Date: 2007-02-15 01:27 pm (UTC)I have a side thread brewing I think!
I can't believe Madonna is getting shafted here
Date: 2007-02-15 01:05 pm (UTC)It's the song where everything I love about Madonan came together perfectly - it's a brilliant, euphoric, uplifting pop song for a start, tackling the classic Madonna theme of religion & sex, but the whole package was great too (and surely of all popstars, with Madonna you have to look at the whole package) - controversial video, a great look, and it came at the time where she'd grown up enough as an artist to be more interesting but not so much that she'd started to take herself too seriously, as happened later on. It totally deserves to go through.
Re: I can't believe Madonna is getting shafted here
Date: 2007-02-15 01:13 pm (UTC)Re: I can't believe Madonna is getting shafted here
Date: 2007-02-15 01:20 pm (UTC)In this case it's an excellent pop song despite the theme though - but not as great as her earlier stuff (I really don't agree that she's "more interesting" in the Like A Prayer era than before: she's more self-consciously autobiographical but the interestingness is there from the beginning)
Re: I can't believe Madonna is getting shafted here
Date: 2007-02-15 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:28 pm (UTC)"Don't Stop Till You Get Enough" vs. "Love Will Tear Us Apart": But on this one the riff of "Love Will Tear Us Apart" is one of the most tunefully beautiful ever but I'm voting against, 'cause the singing, while in style is fine for what Ian is trying to do, is really really terrible in execution; and though overall I'd say riff overwhelms badness of singing, not against good competition and one of the most beautiful singers ever. (Btw, when I voted LWTUA previously (I don't actually remember how consistently I did), it wasn't a matter of my having been there, since being "there" for me meant a general opinion of me and many of the people around me that Joy Division were a terrible retreat from punk and power pop and were actually Pink Floyd in drab garb w/ Jim Morrison-like vocals that were lacking Morrison's ebullience, so JD seemed like a step back. So it took me a while to admit that I actually loved some Joy Division songs a whole lot. I did feel for the beauty of LWTUA right off. I think "She's Lost Control" has a far better performance. (Did consider New Order to be a step forward and also dull as dishwater [unless it's ditchwater that they're dull as; poll: which is duller, dishwater or ditchwater?], and plenty of other dance steppers were dancing further anyway.))
"Work It" vs. "Billie Jean": Already told my love for "Billie Jean"; my not quite love for "Work It"? Hmmm. I said "too cutesy" last time, which states it too strongly (the track is more cutesy peculiar than cutesy ha ha); it's a delight, but "delight," while praising, also identifies a limit; the song doesn't work itself into my heart muscle.
"West End Girls" vs. "Toxic": Feelings about these two aren't so strong, and therefore once again I relistened. It think WEG is actually among PSB's very best, but then I'm talking as a non-PSB fanatic and maybe I like it for being the one where the disco shows through and the vocals and arrangements don't cloak the disco in their sensibility - and the sensibility, not weighing down the sound for once, sounds beautiful. "Toxic" is fun - quite good - but chillier than a lot of other Britney and chillier than WEG. (I wonder now whether, if I were revoting previous rounds, I might vote WEG more and "Toxic" less.)
Everything I'm voting for today is winning decisively.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:35 pm (UTC)By the way, Tom, what are the seedings of these? Do you always put the top seed first?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 01:39 pm (UTC)These fights go:
8 vs 9
13 v Unseeded
6 v 22
2 v 18
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 04:11 pm (UTC)So...
Date: 2007-02-15 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-16 12:02 am (UTC)Come on Britneh
Date: 2007-02-16 11:24 am (UTC)