The Good, The Bad & The Ticky
Feb. 6th, 2007 02:37 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
katstevens.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
poptimistsPlenty of you out there in ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
poptimistsland like writing about music, and even perhaps earn some money for doing so.
Do you find it easier to write about
1) songs you love
2) songs you hate
3) songs you find mediocre?
I can usually find plenty of scathing words about dull music that just isn’t any cop, sometimes even suggesting improvements! However I am loathe to say I 'hate' something as if it has sparked such a reaction in me then I will probably end up loving it eventually. Case in point: when the Spice Girls first arrived I loathed them with such intense obsession that I made sure I paid attention to every song, television appearance and promotional tie-in they did in order to make sure my hatred was well-informed. Now they are one of my favourite pop bands ever, possibly because of my negative reaction: they signified my attraction to pop music was inevitable even though I was an utter indie snob at the time. Well done girls!
As for songs I love, when writing reviews I find it far more difficult to get across *just how much* I love them and why. Of course I can say 'omg this bassline is GREAT' or 'her voice is amazing', but the one thing I can never describe properly is the ZING factor that some songs have, and some songs just don't, even if they sound very similar. Usually the ZING factor ensures that the song remains enjoyable despite repeated plays. For example, Justin Timberlake's Sexyback was interesting and enjoyable but I grew tired of it after a while. My Love on the other hand had the ZING that went straight to a certain bit of my brain, meaning I will happily listen to it forever more. I found the former much easier to write a end-of-year blurb for than the latter.
What do you think,poptimists? If you don't really write about songs then do you find it easier to tick a good song or to 'not tick' a bad song? Is a bad song merely mediocre or does mediocre fall under 'any good at all'?
poptimistsland like writing about music, and even perhaps earn some money for doing so. Do you find it easier to write about
1) songs you love
2) songs you hate
3) songs you find mediocre?
I can usually find plenty of scathing words about dull music that just isn’t any cop, sometimes even suggesting improvements! However I am loathe to say I 'hate' something as if it has sparked such a reaction in me then I will probably end up loving it eventually. Case in point: when the Spice Girls first arrived I loathed them with such intense obsession that I made sure I paid attention to every song, television appearance and promotional tie-in they did in order to make sure my hatred was well-informed. Now they are one of my favourite pop bands ever, possibly because of my negative reaction: they signified my attraction to pop music was inevitable even though I was an utter indie snob at the time. Well done girls!
As for songs I love, when writing reviews I find it far more difficult to get across *just how much* I love them and why. Of course I can say 'omg this bassline is GREAT' or 'her voice is amazing', but the one thing I can never describe properly is the ZING factor that some songs have, and some songs just don't, even if they sound very similar. Usually the ZING factor ensures that the song remains enjoyable despite repeated plays. For example, Justin Timberlake's Sexyback was interesting and enjoyable but I grew tired of it after a while. My Love on the other hand had the ZING that went straight to a certain bit of my brain, meaning I will happily listen to it forever more. I found the former much easier to write a end-of-year blurb for than the latter.
What do you think,
poptimists? If you don't really write about songs then do you find it easier to tick a good song or to 'not tick' a bad song? Is a bad song merely mediocre or does mediocre fall under 'any good at all'?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 06:12 pm (UTC)a) It's got a great guitar solo OR
b) I like the chorus/it's hum-able OR
c) I enjoyed the video OR
d) I feel that I could listen to it whilst lying down OR
e) I get a sense of kindred spirits
f) Silliness
These aren't very intellectual reasons, but then liking music shouldn't be an intellectual pursuit, I don't think. And some bands I love tick all the boxes.
Music I hate, hmmm, I like to make through away/contrary comments sometimes. I don't really spend much time hating though. I know I'll never like Basement Jaxx/LCD Soundsystem/The Smiths/Killer by Adamski/Buffalo Stance...Just music I personally find overly serious/aware of it's own importance, that I feel lacks a sense of fun - IS WORTHY. It's totally okay, if you find this music interesting and fun and find it worthy!
Overall, I would only write about something I liked, in the hope that someone would say they liked it to, or thanks for pointing that out or whatever.