[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I have a day off today, which is grebt, but I forgot to note down the various FITEs for today's poll. So no poll. EXCEPT! I can remember the very next one - because it is an MONSTER.

So this is the televised centre court pick-of-the-round tie, if you like.


[Poll #917645]


Crikey! Maybe this afternoon I will do the rules for the League Of Pop. Or maybe I will go and get a haircut.

Re: Always happy to talk methodology!

Date: 2007-01-31 03:31 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
So the group with the highest ranking total sent its winner up against "Into The Groove".

Wouldn't that be "lowest ranking total"? Or am I not understanding you?

Re: Always happy to talk methodology!

Date: 2007-01-31 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] justfanoe.livejournal.com
I presume he means "highest ranking" in the sense of numerically highest. i.e. a group with a total ranking of 350 has less liked songs than a group with total ranking of 300, but has a "higher ranking". So that "highest ranking total" = worst group. That is how I interpreted it.

Re: Always happy to talk methodology!

Date: 2007-01-31 04:37 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I think I get it: something that's ranked 33 has more "strength" than something ranked 64, hence the lower number is the stronger. But the phrase "highest ranking total" is totally confusing, since 32 is higher ranking than 64. I presume, though, that Tom intends "highest ranking total" to mean "highest numerical total."

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 07:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios