[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists


Today's canon is early 80s new pop* sensation Adam Ant, with or without his trusty backing band of Ants. You get five(-diddly-qua-qua) ticks. Ridicule (in the comments box) is nothing to be scared of!


[Poll #909784]


*was he even considered New Pop, actually? What DID the music press make of him?

Re: attempt at history

Date: 2007-01-19 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
you are confusing it with the s.reynolds/k.punk restatement of same, i think: new pop always had space for dollar or bascially any shiny kim-bright-but-dim random giving texture and depth and difference to the charts -- it wasn't all abt smuggling theory, and i wd say more of it than not wz about unknowingly effecting theory (morely also v.pro siouxsie sioux who wz proto-nupop)

(p*man still argues that the thing to be doing w.theory is talking abt it AS IF IT WERE POP; ie NOT only talkin abt pop if it is "in line" with this week's theory...)

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 02:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios