![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
After my groundbreaking work on the Spice poll, I decided to apply my efforts to the Different Class by Pulp one. This was a bit less exciting. :( (FSVO "exciting" anyway)
The results:
Album Value Factor (this was known as "rockism factor", it's the percentage improvement on a collection of tracks when unified into album status): 8%. Different Class does indeed 'work as an album'.
Individual gaps:
mostlyconnect saw a huge 35% jump in quality when considering the work as an album:
wizzy_w and
hauntedballroom also find their opinion swayed positively by the album format.
katstevens and
awesomewells, however, are put off by the album format, though to a comparatively minor degree.
Singles band: Pulp picked their singles fairly wisely but there's only a 0.7 point uplift between non-singles and singles. A very interesting result here though is
alexmacpherson's individual gap: he likes the singles THREE TIMES as much as non-singles on average. In the other direction
hauntedballroom and
ninebelow spurn the commercial blandishments of the singles marketplace and like the album tracks a lot better.
Key track: What is driving opinion of the Pulp album? The much-neglected tail end of the record turns out to play a crucial role. The track that most closely correlates with overall opinion - and therefore the SECRET HEART of the album - is "Bar Italia" (a 0.67 correlation), with "Monday Morning" and "Underwear" not far behind. "Disco 2000", on the other hand, stands on its own - there is no significant relationship between your opinion of it and overall album quality.
Incidentally there's a big difference here from Spice: the Spice Girls' album quality is more strongly driven by its singles than its album tracks, whereas the reverse is true for Pulp - an individual opinion of Different Class is far less swayed by the hits it contains.
The results:
Album Value Factor (this was known as "rockism factor", it's the percentage improvement on a collection of tracks when unified into album status): 8%. Different Class does indeed 'work as an album'.
Individual gaps:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Singles band: Pulp picked their singles fairly wisely but there's only a 0.7 point uplift between non-singles and singles. A very interesting result here though is
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Key track: What is driving opinion of the Pulp album? The much-neglected tail end of the record turns out to play a crucial role. The track that most closely correlates with overall opinion - and therefore the SECRET HEART of the album - is "Bar Italia" (a 0.67 correlation), with "Monday Morning" and "Underwear" not far behind. "Disco 2000", on the other hand, stands on its own - there is no significant relationship between your opinion of it and overall album quality.
Incidentally there's a big difference here from Spice: the Spice Girls' album quality is more strongly driven by its singles than its album tracks, whereas the reverse is true for Pulp - an individual opinion of Different Class is far less swayed by the hits it contains.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-28 10:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 10:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:59 pm (UTC)