Poptimists Album Science #1
Oct. 18th, 2006 02:19 pmThis is about Proving By Science how good an album REALLY is. How do you do this? The best way to go about it is to mark each track out of ten and then calculate a percentage from the total score. So that is what we're going to do!
Instructions: simply give each track from the album below a mark out of ten by clicking the corresponding radio button - it's that simple!
If you've not heard the song before or need a reminder there are several ways you can remedy this. if you have iTunes you can search for the album on there and listen to the 30 second clips - or you can use Amazon and other sites in a similar way. If the song was released as a single you may well find the video on YouTube.
If you've not heard the song and can't hear it you could either not mark it (if you dislike the artist generally) or give it a 5 for balance if you do like the artist generally (seems fair to me all in all).
The first album to be rated will be Michael Jackson's 'Thriller'. If the experiment proves popular and successful I'll do two more albums from the 80s and then three from the 90s and 00s over the next few weeks.

[Poll #847685]
Don't worry too much about the position of the song in the tracklist and it's relation to what comes before and after it - unless you think that sort of thing affects your response to a track significantly or indeed your judgement of an album as a whole (see comments for big argument about this, probably).
Instructions: simply give each track from the album below a mark out of ten by clicking the corresponding radio button - it's that simple!
If you've not heard the song before or need a reminder there are several ways you can remedy this. if you have iTunes you can search for the album on there and listen to the 30 second clips - or you can use Amazon and other sites in a similar way. If the song was released as a single you may well find the video on YouTube.
If you've not heard the song and can't hear it you could either not mark it (if you dislike the artist generally) or give it a 5 for balance if you do like the artist generally (seems fair to me all in all).
The first album to be rated will be Michael Jackson's 'Thriller'. If the experiment proves popular and successful I'll do two more albums from the 80s and then three from the 90s and 00s over the next few weeks.

[Poll #847685]
Don't worry too much about the position of the song in the tracklist and it's relation to what comes before and after it - unless you think that sort of thing affects your response to a track significantly or indeed your judgement of an album as a whole (see comments for big argument about this, probably).
no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:30 pm (UTC)I had not heard the non-singles on this album before, truth be told. They do seem to be the weaker tracks though.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 04:55 pm (UTC)so you could aproach 'skits' or other kinds of 'interlude' in the same way perhaps. potentially they can be as entertaining as a song altho in practice the stats may well not back this up.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:07 pm (UTC)Lex should definitely hear this.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:48 pm (UTC)to be honest, i have just never really liked the song, end of story. and to the extent that i would change the channel if it came on. it's got a good hook, the video of course, but no sale. (the vincent price rap didn't help but that isn't the motivating factor.)
no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:59 pm (UTC)Speaking of which, the main thing I like about Human Nature is that whenever I hear it I think of SWV's Right Here, which samples it and is heavenly.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 02:11 pm (UTC)And three 10's for me in a row up there. Alas I can't remember much of the rest.
The funk of forty thousand years.
Date: 2006-10-18 02:14 pm (UTC)Re: The funk of forty thousand years.
Date: 2006-10-18 02:23 pm (UTC)Re: The funk of forty thousand years.
Date: 2006-10-18 03:18 pm (UTC)Beat It, on the other hand, is marvellous from start to finish.
The Girl is Mine
Date: 2006-10-18 02:52 pm (UTC)Maybe I've just seen the video too many times...
Re: The Girl is Mine
Date: 2006-10-18 02:55 pm (UTC)Re: The Girl is Mine
Date: 2006-10-18 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-18 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 07:49 am (UTC)"A friend of mine was in Los Angeles 79 thru 87.
Michael Jackson had had a huge hit with Off The
Wall, and was recording the follow up.
"The sessions were arranged for a very late start,
and, after a night on the town, my mate popped
around to the studio to see the producer.
"He got into the control room to find that
everyone's attention was fixed on the glass
window. On the other side, Quincy Jones was kicking
a pile of rags on the floor while shouting
"Silent, you motherfucker! I said NO SQUEAKS!"
"It turned out the pile of rags was a gibbering
Michael Jackson. They were recording a new song
called Billie Jean, and Michael had decided
to fill every gap with his trademark whoops,
clicks and squeaks. Quincy, however, had decided
that the track would be a pared down.
"After several hours of trying to get the
singer to do what he wanted, and having consumed
large quantities of ragedust, Jones had finally
snapped and attacked the poor freak. Needless
to say, after the outburst, MJ sang the song
how he was told to, and the rest is history."
no subject
Date: 2006-10-19 11:30 am (UTC)