Are You Now Or Have You Ever Been....?
Sep. 25th, 2006 11:42 amOne of the battlegrounds in the Hip Hop Wars was NME's "C86" cassette, a tape compiled by some of the paper's writers, later described as "the most indie thing to have ever existed". While many of the bands were later embarassed by it and while it suffers from the usual post-facto "OMG it wasn't a scene" backlash (sure, it wasn't a scene in the sense of bands working and collaborating together, but it captures a mood quite well), its legend lives on.
Here's a poll about it:
[Poll #829524]
SHAMBLE ON.
Here's a poll about it:
[Poll #829524]
SHAMBLE ON.
THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 11:30 am (UTC)i. as a non-retro promo it was taken to be saying the Shambling Scene has our FULL EDITORIAL APPROVAL -- to be a manifesto just as c81 had been
ii. but not only was its sound-range WAY narrower than the impossibly eclectic c81 (which sed EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE AND RELEVANT) but the no.of ppl who were in on the choice was very small also -- roy carr, neil taylor, adrian thrills, plus presumably ed and dep ed ian pye and danny kelly -- so other BIG BEASTS were angry their imprimatur was co-opted
iii. the NME freebie cassettes were (absolutely justifiably) very well-regarded, as primers to jazz, old soul, country, nuggets-type psych; as a library repositary to the past -- or the off-mainstream present -- carr had good instincts, good ears, good connections and GREAT licence-negotiating skeez
iv. the hiphop faction -- stuart cosgrove, paolo hewitt, sean o'hagan, lucy o'brien -- were FAR more aggressive polemicists, fighting for a "music plus broader social context" coverage in the mag (to battle eg the face, arena etc); quite rightly they argued that hiphop was a popular, dynamic, important new music wave -- quite WRONGLY they chose to dress this up in a punk-style kicking-over-the-statues rhetoric, which then had to be woven into a never-going-to-succeed marriage of soft-left pro-kinnock anti-thatcherism and Public Enemy-esque confrontation
v. the locus for angry debate every week was -- of course -- who gets on the cover (black artists were "artistically valid" and "politically correct"; white rockstars pulled in readers, at time when circulation was declining badly, but were very much the "conservative" choice
vi. i think cosgrove's instincts were largely correct -- broaden the topic-base rather than narrow it -- but the delivery was ROTTEN: the writing was often offputting -- it treated a key part of the nme constituency with open contempt without making very much serious attempt actually to bring in new readers (UK hiphop fans -- soul fans, clubbers -- were notorious anyway for not being particularly interested in READING about the music they loved; the modes of addrss that already flourished -- at black echoes and a soul monthly i forget the name of -- were pretty flabby pro-industry puffwork) (actually i retain a fondness for black echoes but it was NOT a writer's paper); and -- the one thing i think the indie faction were intuitively right about, though no one had the writing chops to work this up -- the hiphop faction NEVER dealt with "how music might be political in ways which DOESN'T just fawn on established non-musical politics" (MM were actually a bit better on this, tho frankly i don't think anyone at MM -- from simonR on down -- had much of a clue about non-musical politics except insofar as it was addressed by eg virilio)
vii. there were others acting as the em grit which produced the pearl viz SWELLSY -- editing the dick neecher column -- put in a little cartoon of someone goosestepping called THE HIPHOP HITLERS -- which hardly cooled tempers
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 11:37 am (UTC)Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 11:45 am (UTC)Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 11:55 am (UTC)to be fair i think the britpop line had solid evolutionary links with the earlier red wedge kinnockism -- the hiphop faction were strategically pro anything hewitt's schoolchum paul weller did* -- with the gallaghers in place of wishywashy soul
*haha i recall the STUNNED LOOKS ON ALL FACES as we trooped out of the showing of the style council's film JERUSALEM -- has this ever surfaced since? it is awesome poor
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 12:37 pm (UTC)Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 02:50 pm (UTC)Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 03:04 pm (UTC)[Presumably that's Blues & Soul magazine you're referring to in point vi?]
2. To me at the time the enemy would have probably amounted to Luther Vandross (but not Alex O'Neal, who was tops), Tina Turner and smoothed up 60s survivors like Steve Winwood.
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-25 03:09 pm (UTC)i forgot to mention the BIG FIGHT over "hang the DJ" -- one side saying "THIS IS RACIST", the other side "no no he means TONY BLACKBURN"
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-28 05:23 pm (UTC)Re ""artistically valid" and "politically correct"" -- if I read you correctly, PC was actually used as a positive yes? (A friend of mine who studied in the us in the late 90s introduced me to the term, at which point I did not get the impression it was meant as ridicule.) Backlash of the century, digging one's own grave etc eh?
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-28 05:35 pm (UTC)if it was in use in the office at this time, i'm not sure i heard it or recognised it as such -- so the point i'm making is a bit glib and double-edged hindsight-wise : viz that the "ORDINARY RADICAL POLITICS" being argued for i more or less agree with, and some of the hiphop faction's taste was good; but the ATTITUDE TOWARDS POP i think stinks, actually, tho i didn't have the rhetorical firepower at the time to do anything about it
Re: THE HIPHOP WARS: a personal memoir
Date: 2006-09-28 05:50 pm (UTC)NB!: guy studying in US in "late 90s" above should obv be "late 80s"!!