[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
ok usually when i do this kind of thing i frame the question fast and badly (or i wd never frame it at all) and [livejournal.com profile] koganbot becomes testy towards my fuzziness

but here is MY "explanation" of morrissey = he brought something to the boywing of britrock = called CAMP -- as in polari, as in an angry bitchy code against the UNSTYLISH USELESSNESS of the STRAIGHTS -- except that, since he wz militantly coy abt his sexuality (korrektly, as "coming out" would have stripped a powerful ambiguity out of what he wz doin), his camp was developed as a kind of MALE HET camp...

ANYWAY -- i have always bin ambivalent abt camp as an attitude (it's quickwitted and funny but it's also a compensatory attitude adopted by those who take themselves to be victims and are sniping secretly back...)

and given the shifts since the mid-80s in fashions in sexuality and within sexuality blah blah, i think morrissey's STYLE (sex! yes! but not for me...) reveals itself as a lot more reactionary a-and larkinesque than it did at the time

(again i feel i have not got at the nubbin of what i'm on about but have at it anyway)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
Hah my route back into chartpop (which at the time included the PSBs) at the height of my Smiths fandom was the Pet Shop Boys' Record Mirror front cover with the quote "We're the Smiths you can dance to".

Possible other difference in perspective: I don't have sex vs I do have sex but am not very good at it.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 09:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios