Let's talk PERFECT POP!
Sep. 18th, 2006 01:30 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
So! Perfect Pop! A genre with the propensity to irk even more than 'indie'! So why is this? And who MAKES perfect pop? Surely one of the KINGS of perfect pop is IAN BROUDIE from the Lightning Seeds. Ooh, say it with me! Production values! Record sales!
But also Perfect Pop has been used for the Beach Boys (production-focused attitudes = PRESENT), the erm High Llamas (I can well believe) - Swedish indie popsters get this tag a lot. What irks? Is it the attitude behind calling a song 'perfect' from the start? I like an awful lot of 'perfect pop'? Bear in mind that most 'perfect pop' falls into the 'pop' genre as much as Marit Larsen. Beyoncé might make perfect pop (according to the Lex :)) but she's not 'perfect pop'.
I like an awful lot of 'perfect pop' - to the point where I am considering that Lightning Seeds best-of - so what do YOU chaps think? Is it just indie in major keys and nothing more to it? Help me out here cos there sure aint a page for wikipedia on it and I want to write it! What IRKS you? Wot is GRATE? And who makes 'perfect pop'? And do you like it? If not is it because YOU HATE FUN?
Then again I am still bitter that they deleted my page for Sean's Show *mutter grumble*
But also Perfect Pop has been used for the Beach Boys (production-focused attitudes = PRESENT), the erm High Llamas (I can well believe) - Swedish indie popsters get this tag a lot. What irks? Is it the attitude behind calling a song 'perfect' from the start? I like an awful lot of 'perfect pop'? Bear in mind that most 'perfect pop' falls into the 'pop' genre as much as Marit Larsen. Beyoncé might make perfect pop (according to the Lex :)) but she's not 'perfect pop'.
I like an awful lot of 'perfect pop' - to the point where I am considering that Lightning Seeds best-of - so what do YOU chaps think? Is it just indie in major keys and nothing more to it? Help me out here cos there sure aint a page for wikipedia on it and I want to write it! What IRKS you? Wot is GRATE? And who makes 'perfect pop'? And do you like it? If not is it because YOU HATE FUN?
Then again I am still bitter that they deleted my page for Sean's Show *mutter grumble*
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:47 pm (UTC)I really dislike the concept of Perfect Pop, but I am too ruddy busy to get into a full breakdown of why right now. Will try and write some more about it later.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:56 pm (UTC)http://www.scala-london.co.uk/scala/event.php?id=512
Wednesday 8 Nov, hankies at the ready :(((((
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:11 pm (UTC)i have booked for me and mypete obv ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 09:48 am (UTC)(though i'd have killed to have seen them at King Tut's on the final night of the tour. with a big bottle of buckfast)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:49 pm (UTC)I think the problem with it is that - cf its close comrade "pure pop" - there's a potential suggestion that it's pop with all the impure or complicating elements removed, that it's nothing but the tunes and hooks. But if you find pop exciting partly because of all its complicating impulses and contexts then this putting it in a 'bubble' can be annoying.
(Of course going too far in the OTHER direction can be very irritating too - i.e. oh weren't ABBA rub when it was all DUM DUM DIDDLE and they only got good when the horrible DIVORCES started and the music got as dark as the long swedish night etc etc.)
Starry you should dl the MELODY CLUB song I put up cos it's quite Lightning Seeds-y. As you know I have plenty of time for the Seeds!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:57 pm (UTC)Where is this Melody Club song?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:43 pm (UTC)I always got the sense of it as exactly this, but different in that the complications were added. Kind of - it took as its starting point that chart pop could be good, but wasn't good because it wasn't honest, the lyrics were simplistic clichés, and it was too image-driven. 'Perfect pop' takes chart pop, removes the more synthetic production (and adds production values of its own), adds clever/complex/honest lyrics, adds real musicianship (er in the sense that they play their own instruments, not that they play them well).
I do not like 'perfect pop' as a concept, though I like the occasional band who might fall into its ambit (Black Box Recorder, Saint Etienne).
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 04:05 am (UTC)I liked the Lightning Seeds. I have a soft spot for artistes who, despite being lauded for their songwriting, end up having the biggest hit of their career with AN COVER.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:24 pm (UTC)Is 'Israelites' a perfect pop song or 'just' a perfect reggae song? or both? or neither?
the qualities that make 'Sugar Sugar' great (cute simple memorable melodies and lyrics mainly - is that really all it takes?) can be applied to so much else. but moreover it seems wrong to restrict definition of perfect pop to that. a more complicated production like 'Good Vibrations' may well be deemed just as perfect.
then consider a Supremes song or some of the Spector greats. perfect pop? with Abba it seems synonomous too, as much as with the Jacksons. Buggles. then with synths a new breed of perfect pop became tangible. 'The Model', other usual suspects (Soft Cell, PSBs, HL, DM, Eurythmics). Madonna. MADONNA! in parallel with 'retrograde' steps like 'Come On Eileen' and later 'Chain Reaction' or 'You Win Again' - big #1 singles fighting it out with tracks like 'Pump Up The Volume' - another planet's idea of the perfect pop song? Novelty hits - what price the perfection of 'Star Trekkin' indeed?
Perhaps perfect pop always keeps one eye on the future and the other in the past. And as the wind keeps changing it stays that way!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:25 pm (UTC)It has, it's true, become associated since the 80s with earnest white men with Beatles or Beach Boys/Van Dyke Parks obsessions. Whereas its true spiritual heirs are probably to be found in, I dunno, microhouse or something.
Tom - I'd stay well clear of refs to PP in your Archies piece. "Sugar Sugar" is kinda perfect in my own mind, but it's fairly unique in the bubblegum canon, most of which is determinedly lowest common denominator pop, the dumber the better - which is not IMHO what PP is about.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 02:30 pm (UTC)(I'll say more on Popular after Tom's piece goes up, no doubt)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:31 pm (UTC)Many of the things I've seen described as perfect pop don't strike me as remotely perfect or, often, even good pop.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 05:35 pm (UTC)(Not exactly sure what my point is in printing this, except to note the strangeness of extracting the Archies from this list as the one that represents perfect pop. Maybe "Crimson and Clover" and "Dizzy" would count as well, since they were perceived as bubblegum. But they both have psychedelic overtones. Are Steam and the Temptations too soul? Is "Heard It Through the Grapevine?" too, um, good, to be perfect pop? Too passionate?)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:39 pm (UTC)The "perfect pop" Archies thing comes partly from talking to Kate St Claire. I think reading your first post that you're right though - two different things, one of which serves as a possible role model for the other. So when I say the Archies "get this tag a lot", the taggers I would be talking about would be people with an interest in making (or celebrating) "perfect pop". The people behind the Archies had an interest in making a record that sold a lot in whatever style was needed to do the job.
David Smay's essay on them in Bubblegum Music Is The Naked Truth captures a certain critical mood:
"They had one job and one job only: create the absolutely irresistible pop song. Again and again and again. Together the Archies isolated the genetic strand of the perfect pop hit and replicated it like a honey-dipped virus."
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 12:07 pm (UTC)And even if Smay is reflecting a wider strand of opinion, the problem with the passage you quote is that there's only about 3 or 4 songs in The Archies' catalogue (enjoyable though nearly all of it is) that come even remotely close to matching "Sugar Sugar".
no subject
Date: 2006-09-19 06:50 am (UTC)I think what I hate about the phrase is what Frank describes as the second use of it, which for me taints the first, by implying a kind of walled-off nostalgic recreation of the past, which somehow derives some value from its isolation: 'perfect pop' never means "Straight Out of Compton", does it?
perfect pop for me
Date: 2006-09-19 04:28 pm (UTC)no one has recaptured this, not even crazy frog -- and the appletree blew down years ago and and and... :(
BUT the DOWNLOADABLE CUT-OUT CARDBOARD MOUSTACHE! this would not be hard, oh future svengalis...