[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
by terming david byrne "obscure", [livejournal.com profile] alexmacpherson touches the exact, interesting nerve i think -- maybe even more than with his legendary "why SHOULD i have heard of john wayne?" argument

which is that in every generation (wait, that's how BUFFY starts!! -- er er focus) in every generation there are figures very well-known to all who have just VANISHED from mainstream radar by the next cycle

it's not that they're still popular but currently unfashionable; it's more that "what they meant" is no longer part of the pop discussion -- is that right?

so why has byrne vanished this way? or is it just not making "the right kinds of records" any more?

(disclaimer: i LOVED LOVE LOVED early TH and have i think every record they made --- BUT i went off them INCREDIBLY fast, round abt "true stories", and it took me years to rediscover any fondness)

Date: 2006-09-13 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boyofbadgers.livejournal.com
But my point remains: saying X is off the radar for the kids when yr sole datapoint member of the kids is the Lex is vvv dubious. I hope he won't mind me saying that he has patchy knowledge of all pop cult including most music in the charts right now.

Not that I disagree that T.Heads are off the Radar for yr average 16 year old now, mind.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 10:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios