utterly forgotten but NOT OBSCURE
Sep. 13th, 2006 02:35 pmby terming david byrne "obscure",
alexmacpherson touches the exact, interesting nerve i think -- maybe even more than with his legendary "why SHOULD i have heard of john wayne?" argument
which is that in every generation (wait, that's how BUFFY starts!! -- er er focus) in every generation there are figures very well-known to all who have just VANISHED from mainstream radar by the next cycle
it's not that they're still popular but currently unfashionable; it's more that "what they meant" is no longer part of the pop discussion -- is that right?
so why has byrne vanished this way? or is it just not making "the right kinds of records" any more?
(disclaimer: i LOVED LOVE LOVED early TH and have i think every record they made --- BUT i went off them INCREDIBLY fast, round abt "true stories", and it took me years to rediscover any fondness)
which is that in every generation (wait, that's how BUFFY starts!! -- er er focus) in every generation there are figures very well-known to all who have just VANISHED from mainstream radar by the next cycle
it's not that they're still popular but currently unfashionable; it's more that "what they meant" is no longer part of the pop discussion -- is that right?
so why has byrne vanished this way? or is it just not making "the right kinds of records" any more?
(disclaimer: i LOVED LOVE LOVED early TH and have i think every record they made --- BUT i went off them INCREDIBLY fast, round abt "true stories", and it took me years to rediscover any fondness)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 02:05 pm (UTC)er
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 02:13 pm (UTC)This is a major step down in fame for Byrne who was, as Mark suggests, famous and spoken of in the 80s WAY beyond his record sales.