A delay in the poll caused by my having some work, but finally the ship of retrospective metapop criticism sails into the waters of 1983 - Jackson the winner, Culture Club getting some serious vote-splitting, and this year the P&J poll included a BEST VIDEO section for the first time, which we might well discuss in a separate YouTube-enabled poll later (I can't get YouTube at work).
Procedural Note: I've excised "Back On The Chain Gang" by the Pretenders as it featured last time.
You only get EIGHT votes this time - use them wisely.
[Poll #819820]
The Joptimists Poll Remix for 1982:
1. Don't You Want Me (49 votes)
2. 1999 (46 votes)
3. The Message (43 votes)
4. Temptation (37 votes)
5. The Look Of Love (36 votes)
6=. Mickey (31 votes)
6=. Sexual Healing (31 votes)
8. Planet Rock (28 votes)
9. Rock The Casbah (26 votes)
10. Pass The Dutchie (24 votes)
Procedural Note: I've excised "Back On The Chain Gang" by the Pretenders as it featured last time.
You only get EIGHT votes this time - use them wisely.
[Poll #819820]
The Joptimists Poll Remix for 1982:
1. Don't You Want Me (49 votes)
2. 1999 (46 votes)
3. The Message (43 votes)
4. Temptation (37 votes)
5. The Look Of Love (36 votes)
6=. Mickey (31 votes)
6=. Sexual Healing (31 votes)
8. Planet Rock (28 votes)
9. Rock The Casbah (26 votes)
10. Pass The Dutchie (24 votes)
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:49 pm (UTC)Also JLC's favouritest ever record.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:51 pm (UTC)I like that No Doubt song.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 03:45 pm (UTC)A parallel example: if I said "It is a fact that the name and face of Salmon P. Chase was put on the American $10,000 bill in 1928," I would expect that one of the things you *could* deduce from this would be that Salmon P. Chase must've been somebody sorta important to America, even if you didn't know who he was or weren't alive in 1928.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 12:59 pm (UTC)Also it sets you up for hypocrises: if someone heard Placebo's cover of "Running Up That Hill" (which you dislike on principle rather than aesthetic grounds, right?) and enjoyed it but had never heard of the Kate Bush version, you'd be pretty incensed, right?
(Also you're defining 'obscure' to mean "I haven't heard it" AGAIN)
I agree with you on the writing, more or less - I have more of a problem when you don't know why other people like music than when you don't know the music they like.
It's not quite so surprising that someone wouldn't have heard of your two examples - they haven't been played on radio constantly for the last two decades.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 01:45 pm (UTC)they haven't been played on radio constantly for the last two decades
neither have Talking Heads in the past decade!
I mean, before this fiasco I had an interest in hearing them, others have recommended them to me, but I find myself not wanting to care about them any more.
Fact-check
Date: 2006-09-13 01:48 pm (UTC)Re: Fact-check
Date: 2006-09-13 02:05 pm (UTC)Re: Fact-check
Date: 2006-09-13 02:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-13 01:04 pm (UTC)