The dust has settled and 32 of 64 songs stand ready for the next round. Say a sad farewell to Ace of Base, Betty Boo, and - yes - Gorillaz among others. Then prepare for the next instalment of ALL OUT POP BATTLE.
i.e. pick which song you think is best.
In round 2 each song is facing one of its close contemporaries, the battle of the ages having proved indecisive.
[Poll #797787]
How the draw was decided:
i. Examination of real actual chart placing i.e. 2 for Human League, 7 for Pulp.
ii. Examination of tick % from revious now poll i.e. 79% for HL, 81% for P.
iii. These two things not being in agreement I just went for the one I liked best, seeing as it's me who's gone to the bother of polling these things. Bye Disco 2000!
i.e. pick which song you think is best.
In round 2 each song is facing one of its close contemporaries, the battle of the ages having proved indecisive.
[Poll #797787]
How the draw was decided:
i. Examination of real actual chart placing i.e. 2 for Human League, 7 for Pulp.
ii. Examination of tick % from revious now poll i.e. 79% for HL, 81% for P.
iii. These two things not being in agreement I just went for the one I liked best, seeing as it's me who's gone to the bother of polling these things. Bye Disco 2000!
Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:43 pm (UTC)Partially it's our inner indie coming out (or Lex's clubby tendencies), but is that all?
Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:46 pm (UTC)"Mmmbop" is chirpy but a bit irritating.
"Music Sounds..." pretty much set the tone for pop-dance for the next several years though I think most of its imitators were better.
So it's not indieism so much as a genuflection to a 'genre classic' maybe.
Or it's just a better record.
Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:46 pm (UTC)Music Sounds Better With You is a great club record, not a poptimist smash.
Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:48 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:49 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 04:46 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 09:11 pm (UTC)While I agree that the next wave of pop hits may have been smarter, I really don't agree they are catchier. Plus they are all a lot more heavily-produced, while mmmbop has this naive exuberance coursing through it from start to finish that no amount of expert songwriters or producers could quite replicate. I'm not saying I don't like the other groups you mention, but there was something quite unique about mmmbop that could only have been produced by a group of kids that age.
Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 09:56 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 02:56 pm (UTC)of the people behind Stardust, all but the vocalist have done better work elsewhere.
Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 01:50 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 02:10 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 02:30 pm (UTC)Re: Please explain
Date: 2006-08-17 02:56 pm (UTC)