[identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I was looking att he latest issue of Q yesterday int he library and reading through their list of '50 Guiltiest Pleasures'. And it got me to thinking - is the idea of a 'guilty pleasure' inherently rockist? Most of the songs I 'like but shouldn't like' are songs I wouldn't normally listen to except because of association/nostalgic reasons because they're a bit rubbish. But not liking ELO's Living Thing just because the rock canon doesn't like them? And don't even get me started on Macarthur Park...

So does poptimism recognise the concept of the guilty pleasure, or - as it should be - music is music and whether it's the gaspings of a tortured soul or the wall of sound rebuilt in Duplo, what matters is whether it's ANY GOOD AT ALL?

There should be a poll on this, maybe, but I don't have the issue to hand.

Date: 2006-08-03 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] braisedbywolves.livejournal.com
I have another version of this, which is stuff that I really liked, and still enjoy, but I just listen to it too much EG the only album I've listened to for the first three days this week was Aimee Mann's Whatever. These are probably worse than "Guilty Pleasures", since at least those have a mental hangnail that keeps you involved in considering why you do and don't like it etc etc.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 19th, 2026 09:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios