Are Ideas Enough?
Oct. 12th, 2005 03:57 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
steviespitfire.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
poptimistsA thread that's currently languishing over at ILC[omics], could work here too.
Is just having ideas enough in pop? The answer is probably, "No", but it ties in with the Rachel vs Sugababes thing on the other thread: I think Rachel has more/better ideas than the Sugababes, but I'm not sure it's the reason I prefer the former. Similarly, for Lex, who prefers the latter, is this prefence based on the fact that the ideas on th RS don't hang together or make it muddled?
Thing is: "hipsters" into pop tend to go mad for the IDEAS; does the ordinary public, dya think?
Is just having ideas enough in pop? The answer is probably, "No", but it ties in with the Rachel vs Sugababes thing on the other thread: I think Rachel has more/better ideas than the Sugababes, but I'm not sure it's the reason I prefer the former. Similarly, for Lex, who prefers the latter, is this prefence based on the fact that the ideas on th RS don't hang together or make it muddled?
Thing is: "hipsters" into pop tend to go mad for the IDEAS; does the ordinary public, dya think?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2005-10-12 05:25 pm (UTC)Here's a question: how does the growth in technology effect the Idea? Do y'all think it's a hindrance? Does the Idea, the gimmick, depend on accident? Like DJ Pierre messing about with a 303 or whatevah. Increased technology makes the best Ideas simply presets of some machine?
I'm not sure it is a hindranc, tbh.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-12 05:28 pm (UTC)