[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
I have done the freebie CD for Friday - its theme is COVER VERSIONS. As a listen-to-all-the-way-through experience it works not at all, but every track is quite interesting and there is one you can't get anywhere else in the WORLD.

Feel free to use this lure in yr continued individual hype of London's Trendy Poptimism.

All Poptimists should make sure they download the amazing German hip-hop that [livejournal.com profile] steviespitfire put up recently, especially "Schwule Madchen" which will be played on Friday if the burner behaves.

I was thinking in the bath this morning, apropos of little, about 'Popist' thort, and I decided on the following as a basic principle of how I think about music. It's pretty obvious I think but a whole lot of criticism doesn't seem to accept it.

Most people have good reasons for buying or enjoying the music they do.

There.

Date: 2005-10-12 11:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steviespitfire.livejournal.com
So I take it we're assuming that "because they're part of the canon" = a bad reason?

I think I agree with the above [now] [have outgrown canon-whoring, myself] BUT I can see how someone could say "Well, look, 'Blonde on Blonde' or 'Dark Side of the Moon' ect are regularly mentioned as being great by bods in Q ect whom I trust [this trust is a whole sidee issue of good reasons [for rockists!] ERGO this is a good reason for me to buy said albums."

I don't think that's fallacious reasoning, and, even if it is, it's no worse than me going, "Hey, listen to this German hip-hop, it's great" and people trusting my judgement/thinking THAT is a good enough reason?

Date: 2005-10-12 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] braisedbywolves.livejournal.com
You do make it sound like they're being conned. Far more likely that they say "I really like these artists/this album when I heard it on the radio/a friends house/a tape, so I'm going to buy it" and they're right.

Date: 2005-10-12 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steviespitfire.livejournal.com
Ah, well, they are being conned, I guess, if they don't particularly like Pink Floyd, yeah! :)

Date: 2005-10-12 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steviespitfire.livejournal.com
The thing about canons, not just The Canon, is that they are constructed by people on the inside, so to speak, and I'm not sure people who want to buy into a certain canon are being conned necessarily.

There's some sort of thinking behind it, like, "Gee, I'd sure just like to hear some of these good records they're banging on about" with the attendant assumption that they like/have heard [of] some similar stuff. Though not always.

Wasn't there an ILM thread, recently, about posting ILM canonical tracks at someone's request? This guy wants to join "the club".

Date: 2005-10-12 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] steviespitfire.livejournal.com
i.e. "Wanting to join the club" in this way seems an okay enough reason in my book, I guess.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 07:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios