Ride A White Poll
May. 17th, 2006 12:18 pmJanuary's Top 40 Singles poll saw apparently everyone's favourite indie-pop stalwarts Belle & Sebastian clinch the top spot with 17 ticks and 54.8% of the vote, with Jose Gonzales, Mylo ft. Freeform Five and Will Young all languishing in joint second place with 13 ticks each. A traditionally weak month there, but things are starting to hot up a little in February, maybe?
[Poll #730533]
[Poll #730533]
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:21 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:27 pm (UTC)Wait a moment, WHY AM I ENGAGING IN THIS ARGUMENT...
anyway, not heard 'Run It' yet but will try and do so tonight.
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:35 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:42 pm (UTC)more important/interesting though is how we go about discerning these genres i.e. sorting the Crunkpop wheat from the Crunkpop chaff. i have no interest in championing entire genres/styles 'for the greater good' or whatever so want to see more dissecting of what it is that makes one track good but another bad when to a person who doesn't seem to like the genre for whatever reason cannot tell the difference.
example came up on ILM yesterday re Pussycat Dolls 'Beep' and Ciara. obv. some love both, some hate both but it's those who dislike one but like the other who may be most interesting?
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:47 pm (UTC)as Gareth alluded to on another ILM thread, techno being an immersive thing best experienced in clubs where the hours meld into one stream of what may as well be one single force of sound with no need to decide which bits you like best or whatever - just enjoy it as a complete experience. but outside the club this approach can be contradicted, when it comes to actually buying records. but then people always enthuse about certain mix CDs, even when they don't love every track to the same level, or maybe they don't even like all the tracks featured?
but i've never been able to really do that personally. i just hear (look for?) peaks and troughs and want to set them apart. very anoraky i suppose.
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:03 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:05 pm (UTC)Same applies to electrohouse and minimal house bobbins and every other subgenre of course.
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:09 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:16 pm (UTC)Of course I'll say 'I like pop' or 'I'll like techno' or other genre as much as anyone so it doesn't really matter. But the 'sure it stands to reason it won't all be great' caveat is also acknowledged somehow within that.
So when people say they love a genre they mean they love the ethos of it as they see it, don't they? Which is good...as you can discuss what that ethos is (esp. when it gets as nebulous as 'Pop'). But also bad for reasons given (the compulsion and process of sorting).
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:24 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:31 pm (UTC)I mean yeah it DOES apply, usually when the artist in question is not being crunk'n'b enough - ie something like Amerie's 'Touch' works as a generic crunk'n'b setpiece so well because it ticks every genre box, whereas, I dunno, 'Gotta Be You' by the Sugababes is clearly based on crunk'n'b but doesn't manage the signifiers well enough? (though I think 'Gotta Be You' works very well in other ways)
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 03:31 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:29 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:33 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:37 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:40 pm (UTC)I hate US college indie kids so much.
Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 01:47 pm (UTC)Re: Aiy!
Date: 2006-05-17 02:51 pm (UTC)