[identity profile] jauntyalan.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
More a mid-week topic this. I mentioned elsewhere (wrt Merritt and zip-a-dee-doo-dah) that it has only just occurred to me that there really is a category of "Guilty Pleasures" - just not the latest gutless variation on "so bad its good". There can be music you really like, but for some reason the song is actually morally wrong or tainted. And not in the indie ("S club Juniors that's so wrong") or mirror-indie ("all indie boys can't sing they should all die"*) sense. The only good example I can think of right now is

Gary Glitter.

I love you love. Leader. SMASHing, real fun songs. Sung by a man with a twisted brane of badness cubed. (Of course there is a whole vein of pa3d0 british pop which we can take as read here.) But what else is there? Anybody here enjoy fascist/nazi/racialist music? dancehall homophobia i suppose. wot sa u?


(* naming no names, cos we're done with that, right?)

Date: 2006-05-12 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Shabba Ranks.

Date: 2006-05-12 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Ah. You mean like when the mums and dads went mental in the 50s when they found out their kids were dancing to sechsy Elvis?

Date: 2006-05-12 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Doubt our Shabba would go down well at G-A-Y.

Date: 2006-05-12 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com
Jonathan King?

but yes, i think this mainly leads back to the "right-on white boys be liking dancehall" thing doesn't it?

Another example, with which I agree

Date: 2006-05-12 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
Fear of a Black Planet is best PE album despite "Meet tha G that Killed Me" etc.

Re: Another example, with which I agree

Date: 2006-05-12 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
Black Planet really is the best PE album, but doesn't this kind of logic lead one back to the racial stuff again, where huge swathes of rap and hip-hop have to be written off b/c they glorify violence and/or denigrate women. If you want out of that cul-de-sac, aren't you forced to talk about 'authenticity' (ie., 'it's all just a pose' so it's okay to like it)?

Re: Another example, with which I agree

Date: 2006-05-12 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
rap is overtly and self-consciously a music of clashing opinions (even just in the rapped words alone), before you even get to the (implicit?) ideologies of the samples -- and plenty of the very ferocious stuff is also an expression of conflictedness in any one mind-voice

think of it as a play w/o a moralistic last act yet("it's all acting so..."): authenticity needn't come into it (TS: mannerist acting vs method acting); and YOU'RE the one who'se being dragged on-stage to direct-act-cause the closure

Snoop Dogg

Date: 2006-05-12 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] celentari.livejournal.com
Dre got some bitches from the city of Compton
To serve me, not with a cherry on top
Cause when I bust my nut, I'm raisin up off the cot
Don't get upset girl, that's just how it goes
I don't love you hoes, I'm out the do'

i.e. I will shag you and leave you and that's just how it is. Obnoxious, but I like the song.

Date: 2006-05-12 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
if you treat all "artworks" (however small) as a big old squabblecake of contradictory layers -- or a patch of conversation arguing with itself as well as its surround -- this issue becomes much easier to handle: ie can you separate out the [-x-] and the anti-[-x-] elements in [item under consideration]? can you hear how the [FORCE OF EVIL] is being wrestled with, or allowed to win? (cf also trotsky's useful phrase REACTIONARY UTOPIAS)

on ilm i used to call this the "anti-n4zi hihat argument" (a catchy meme which NEVER CAUGHT ON boo) -- by which i suppose i was implying that (let's say) the political argument of the RHYTHM in n4zi sk4 is at subtle subliminal war with the political argument of the WORDS

Date: 2006-05-12 02:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
with shabba (and a lot of ragga) the "ideology" of the words-as-lyrics is NOT in sync with the "physical ideology" of the mode of word-delivery or the ideology of collective dance itself -- hence simultaneous attraction and repulsion

and opting for one OR the other as the "pure truth" of the song sorta kinda misses the conflicted essence (i first wrote "point" there, which assumes shabba would see things my way here, but maybe he wouldn't at all -- however HIS justification of the song's politics isn't and shouldn't be definitive)

Date: 2006-05-12 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
ok but where is this true? i haven't followed much of the stepin fetchit er er stephin merrit argt, but even he is a. a strong-version auteurist and b. operating at a cross-fluence of conversations, discourse and er "music tongue-types", some of which he has absorbed totally unconsciously, others he is tussling with guardedly and with ideological articulacy ect ect

there is no such thing as a private language -- this applies to all musics also outside a very lovelorn militant wing of ultra-modernism (which insisted on reinventing the language new with each work)

Date: 2006-05-12 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
"if you like this song you are one of us"
vs
"to be one of us you must agree with us"

music is NOT belief-sticky, which words (even songwords) are: so the second -- however much assumed or hoped for by some -- fails (personally i am inclined to argue that its NECESSARY failure is one of the reasons music is socially useful: its ability to create gatherings that aren't POSITION-based...)

Date: 2006-05-12 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
So what is at subliminal war in the work of Gary Gl1tter?

I can actually see this more - staying with the same area of crime - with W1ll1am M4yne, the way in his work there's a sense of children as individuals, moral agents and still very 'allowed to be' children. (But then on the other hand the horror of his case is the way that - before it all came out - he struck me as a writer who really understood children. Which then led me to think - really understanding children is a v v useful skill for a p34d0 to have, it's something both - ugh - 'aspects' of WM's life would have tried to foster.)

Somewhat grim thoughts for a Friday afternoon eh!

Date: 2006-05-12 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
well i have never LIKED gg's work (in the face of MUCH POPTIMIST HIVEMIND STUBBORNNESS back in the day) so i am inclined to argue that attractions and replusions really ARE present, like, empirically

but actually identifying the strands is the work-not-done that i am invoking (rather than, say, DOING it)

(the kind of work i'm talking abt = like when kogan sez a GREAT musicologist wd be able to link up doors basslines with meltzer's vomit-pill)

Date: 2006-05-12 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
the good side of GG

Green Gartside
Gina G
Gloria Gaynor
GoGo's

the bad side of GG

G*ry Gl*tter
Gus Gus
Goo Goo Dolls

Date: 2006-05-12 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
I'm with Tigger on this. GG is a very different case from latter day Jacko (cited below), where you can see the 'crimes' he ascribed to him seeping into his work. There was -- drawing on very vague remembrances now -- certainly something lascivious to his songs, but lots of rock n pop is. At the time, no more likely to be a pedophile than, say, David Essex.

Date: 2006-05-12 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
well the point i am arguing is one which (for example) sets the ideology of the BASSLINE against the the ideology of the brass section, and in this case it's pretty hard not to find yrself reading bad stuff back into not-at-the-time obnoxious material (tho as i say i ALWAYS found him obnoxious so i have a teenytiny get-out here)

what i once wrote about j.king (http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/jking.html)

one of the reasons i haven't finished my "teach mark s a lesson" about m.bolan's unicorn is that i find the formerly innocent topic of HOT GOBLINISM is these days a bit toxic

Date: 2006-05-12 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Hmm. Late era Michael Jackson?

Date: 2006-05-12 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
"i am the damned/i am the dead/i am the agony inside a dying head"

i think there is lots in wacko's work -- from the late 80s on -- which clues you in to trouble in mind (cf stuff kogan and i both wrote about him back then)

Date: 2006-05-12 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Also wot abt dude from the Darkness who has turned out to be bigoted Xenophobic Bosch-bashing Barsteward?

Date: 2006-05-12 03:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
He's done a racialist world cup song.

Date: 2006-05-12 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com
xenophobic perhaps...

he is so full of coke he doesn't know where he is...

Date: 2006-05-12 03:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
If you go down this path - taking Justin seriously - then don't you have to take Ozzy et al's Satanism as well? It seems pushing the envelope, although perhaps it's not fair to compare such a short career with longer (and more successful) ones.

Date: 2006-05-12 03:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
True. He was the most recent one I can think of though - the interviews he's done re: his world cup song have seen him make an Utter T0ssp1ece of himself.

Date: 2006-05-12 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com
i'm more reminded of the GOSH AREN'T WE CONTROV antics that surrounded the manics about the third single into the "gold against the soul" campaign, when they appeared to be pretty much down and out.

i can't see justin coming back with a holy bible though somehow...

Date: 2006-05-12 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Xenophobic, yes (stand corrected).

A mild case perhaps but still quite morally queasy for me. I don't usually have trouble listening to records by ppl who are Utter Cvnts but if the record is bad as well it magnifies the cvntiness of the artist...

Date: 2006-05-12 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-newham.livejournal.com
'Rock and roll' by Gary Glitter is VERY good, but I prefer the Human League's version.

Date: 2006-05-12 04:37 pm (UTC)

Date: 2006-05-12 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
We're giving the concept of pleasure a good fisting here, no?

IN A GOOD WAY

Date: 2006-05-12 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
it is almost boycottian!

Date: 2006-05-12 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nicolars.livejournal.com
I've always liked GG, and Michael Jackson too.

There are also an uncomfortable amount of artists who have either beaten or abused women, and I always feel slightly guilty about liking their music (not that it has stopped me).

Don't need a cure need a final solution

Date: 2006-05-12 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
By listening to Gary Glitter, or buying his records, or suggesting you do the same, I'm not likely to be spreading pedophilia (sp?), because there's nothing in the records that is likely to inspire pedophilia.

But, say, listening to, promoting, adoring songs that tend to portray and valorize self-destruction as a meaningful social protest, as a stance that challenges the mainstream, and as a way of life that is more moral than not being self-destructive (so, a vast amount of my listening from age 13 when I first bought Sounds of Silence onward through most of my young adulthood and not altogether departed from my listening now and not altogether unpresent from my song lyrics 1981-1985 back when I was writing songs)... yes I know this music is conflicted but it can and is embraced and acted on by people who decide that the message really is "life is just to die." How it's to be acted on is not written into the lyrics, of course. Range might be:

(1) My ex-wife Leslie once telling me that hearing the Sex Pistols and Teenage Jesus back in the late '70s when she was a teenager saved her from killing herself because it told her she was not alone.

vs.

(2) "Peter Laughner had his private pains and compulsions, but at least in part he died because he wanted to be Lou Reed," which Lester Bangs wrote in his obit for Peter. Peter's ex-wife Charlotte pretty much said the same thing to me, about it being too bad that Peter picked up the VU's death romanticism.

Charlotte in the late '80s, in her review of Bangs's Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung: "Most of my friends in the rock 'n' roll scene here [in Cleveland] are still stuck in the jester deviant role, still playing the death dwarf (bad drugs only, please), and still stuck in a town anxious and anal-retentive enough to be upset by it all, sometimes."

I don't know if "guilt" is at issue, but I still get a kick out of listening to hearing Peter sing "Ain't it fun when you know that you're gonna die young" in that old Rocket From The Tombs recording, and I still feel weird about getting that kick.

Re: Don't need a cure need a final solution

Date: 2006-05-12 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
That post was by me, obviously.

Anal-Retentive Spice

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 06:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios