Real Actual Guilty Pleasures
May. 12th, 2006 03:26 pmMore a mid-week topic this. I mentioned elsewhere (wrt Merritt and zip-a-dee-doo-dah) that it has only just occurred to me that there really is a category of "Guilty Pleasures" - just not the latest gutless variation on "so bad its good". There can be music you really like, but for some reason the song is actually morally wrong or tainted. And not in the indie ("S club Juniors that's so wrong") or mirror-indie ("all indie boys can't sing they should all die"*) sense. The only good example I can think of right now is
Gary Glitter.
I love you love. Leader. SMASHing, real fun songs. Sung by a man with a twisted brane of badness cubed. (Of course there is a whole vein of pa3d0 british pop which we can take as read here.) But what else is there? Anybody here enjoy fascist/nazi/racialist music? dancehall homophobia i suppose. wot sa u?
(* naming no names, cos we're done with that, right?)
Gary Glitter.
I love you love. Leader. SMASHing, real fun songs. Sung by a man with a twisted brane of badness cubed. (Of course there is a whole vein of pa3d0 british pop which we can take as read here.) But what else is there? Anybody here enjoy fascist/nazi/racialist music? dancehall homophobia i suppose. wot sa u?
(* naming no names, cos we're done with that, right?)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:43 pm (UTC)but yes, i think this mainly leads back to the "right-on white boys be liking dancehall" thing doesn't it?
Another example, with which I agree
Date: 2006-05-12 02:52 pm (UTC)Re: Another example, with which I agree
Date: 2006-05-12 04:30 pm (UTC)Re: Another example, with which I agree
Date: 2006-05-12 04:41 pm (UTC)think of it as a play w/o a moralistic last act yet("it's all acting so..."): authenticity needn't come into it (TS: mannerist acting vs method acting); and YOU'RE the one who'se being dragged on-stage to direct-act-cause the closure
Snoop Dogg
Date: 2006-05-12 02:45 pm (UTC)To serve me, not with a cherry on top
Cause when I bust my nut, I'm raisin up off the cot
Don't get upset girl, that's just how it goes
I don't love you hoes, I'm out the do'
i.e. I will shag you and leave you and that's just how it is. Obnoxious, but I like the song.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:48 pm (UTC)on ilm i used to call this the "anti-n4zi hihat argument" (a catchy meme which NEVER CAUGHT ON boo) -- by which i suppose i was implying that (let's say) the political argument of the RHYTHM in n4zi sk4 is at subtle subliminal war with the political argument of the WORDS
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:54 pm (UTC)and opting for one OR the other as the "pure truth" of the song sorta kinda misses the conflicted essence (i first wrote "point" there, which assumes shabba would see things my way here, but maybe he wouldn't at all -- however HIS justification of the song's politics isn't and shouldn't be definitive)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:05 pm (UTC)stepin fetchiter er stephin merrit argt, but even he is a. a strong-version auteurist and b. operating at a cross-fluence of conversations, discourse and er "music tongue-types", some of which he has absorbed totally unconsciously, others he is tussling with guardedly and with ideological articulacy ect ectthere is no such thing as a private language -- this applies to all musics also outside a very lovelorn militant wing of ultra-modernism (which insisted on reinventing the language new with each work)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:15 pm (UTC)so where can the guilt be imported into a song? (another way of recasting my initial question) from the people involved in its creation was my initial answer, and was wondering about other ways.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:36 pm (UTC)vs
"to be one of us you must agree with us"
music is NOT belief-sticky, which words (even songwords) are: so the second -- however much assumed or hoped for by some -- fails (personally i am inclined to argue that its NECESSARY failure is one of the reasons music is socially useful: its ability to create gatherings that aren't POSITION-based...)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:58 pm (UTC)I can actually see this more - staying with the same area of crime - with W1ll1am M4yne, the way in his work there's a sense of children as individuals, moral agents and still very 'allowed to be' children. (But then on the other hand the horror of his case is the way that - before it all came out - he struck me as a writer who really understood children. Which then led me to think - really understanding children is a v v useful skill for a p34d0 to have, it's something both - ugh - 'aspects' of WM's life would have tried to foster.)
Somewhat grim thoughts for a Friday afternoon eh!
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:12 pm (UTC)but actually identifying the strands is the work-not-done that i am invoking (rather than, say, DOING it)
(the kind of work i'm talking abt = like when kogan sez a GREAT musicologist wd be able to link up doors basslines with meltzer's vomit-pill)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:39 pm (UTC)Green Gartside
Gina G
Gloria Gaynor
GoGo's
the bad side of GG
G*ry Gl*tter
Gus Gus
Goo Goo Dolls
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:53 pm (UTC)what i once wrote about j.king (http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/jking.html)
one of the reasons i haven't finished my "teach mark s a lesson" about m.bolan's unicorn is that i find the formerly innocent topic of HOT GOBLINISM is these days a bit toxic
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:08 pm (UTC)i think there is lots in wacko's work -- from the late 80s on -- which clues you in to trouble in mind (cf stuff kogan and i both wrote about him back then)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:34 pm (UTC)he is so full of coke he doesn't know where he is...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:42 pm (UTC)i can't see justin coming back with a holy bible though somehow...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:43 pm (UTC)A mild case perhaps but still quite morally queasy for me. I don't usually have trouble listening to records by ppl who are Utter Cvnts but if the record is bad as well it magnifies the cvntiness of the artist...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 04:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 04:52 pm (UTC)IN A GOOD WAY
Date: 2006-05-12 05:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 06:50 pm (UTC)There are also an uncomfortable amount of artists who have either beaten or abused women, and I always feel slightly guilty about liking their music (not that it has stopped me).
Don't need a cure need a final solution
Date: 2006-05-12 07:21 pm (UTC)But, say, listening to, promoting, adoring songs that tend to portray and valorize self-destruction as a meaningful social protest, as a stance that challenges the mainstream, and as a way of life that is more moral than not being self-destructive (so, a vast amount of my listening from age 13 when I first bought Sounds of Silence onward through most of my young adulthood and not altogether departed from my listening now and not altogether unpresent from my song lyrics 1981-1985 back when I was writing songs)... yes I know this music is conflicted but it can and is embraced and acted on by people who decide that the message really is "life is just to die." How it's to be acted on is not written into the lyrics, of course. Range might be:
(1) My ex-wife Leslie once telling me that hearing the Sex Pistols and Teenage Jesus back in the late '70s when she was a teenager saved her from killing herself because it told her she was not alone.
vs.
(2) "Peter Laughner had his private pains and compulsions, but at least in part he died because he wanted to be Lou Reed," which Lester Bangs wrote in his obit for Peter. Peter's ex-wife Charlotte pretty much said the same thing to me, about it being too bad that Peter picked up the VU's death romanticism.
Charlotte in the late '80s, in her review of Bangs's Psychotic Reactions and Carburetor Dung: "Most of my friends in the rock 'n' roll scene here [in Cleveland] are still stuck in the jester deviant role, still playing the death dwarf (bad drugs only, please), and still stuck in a town anxious and anal-retentive enough to be upset by it all, sometimes."
I don't know if "guilt" is at issue, but I still get a kick out of listening to hearing Peter sing "Ain't it fun when you know that you're gonna die young" in that old Rocket From The Tombs recording, and I still feel weird about getting that kick.
Re: Don't need a cure need a final solution
Date: 2006-05-12 07:23 pm (UTC)Anal-Retentive Spice