![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
dubdobdee.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
poptimiststhe "buffy" = who EVERYONE (INKORREKTLY) THINKS IT'S THE STORY OF cannot be referred to as the "buffy"
bcz
i. duh (see defn and extrapolate)
ii. xander already uses up the BtVS-character slot
iii. basic comedy laziness (cf ii.)
iv. BCZ I SAY (<--u&k as we used to say)
v. INTO EACH GENERATION IS BORN 1xSLAYER DYS
vi. etc
Anyway we do need a better term, so propose away...
bcz
i. duh (see defn and extrapolate)
ii. xander already uses up the BtVS-character slot
iii. basic comedy laziness (cf ii.)
iv. BCZ I SAY (<--u&k as we used to say)
v. INTO EACH GENERATION IS BORN 1xSLAYER DYS
vi. etc
Anyway we do need a better term, so propose away...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:04 pm (UTC)It may work for non-sitcoms as a depiction of heaven too but I've never tried to fit it.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:07 pm (UTC)oddly enuff i was trying to pin the not-the-buffy down via titles-that-are-names sit-coms viz SEINFELD, NORM, FRAZIER, EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND, EVERYONE HATES CHRIS, RHODA, but none of them (so far) fit my specific bill
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:15 pm (UTC)Other non-sitcom auggestions:
1. Robin Hood? (this may fall down on the EVERYONE part of the eqn)
2. Kane? (as in Citizen)
3. Rupert the Bear?
jeff you are a genius
Date: 2006-05-12 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:39 pm (UTC)(whose hell is it in ally mcb?)
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:03 pm (UTC)BLOSSOM???
no subject
Date: 2006-05-12 02:04 pm (UTC)IT IS SO SIMPLE
Date: 2006-05-12 02:12 pm (UTC)ii. buffy is the jerry-in-the-good-life of buffy
iii. i. and ii. are both TRUE hence (a fortiori) compatible
iv. there is no buffy (except in buffy)
v. the poochie of the spice girls = david bechham
Re: IT IS SO SIMPLE
Date: 2006-05-12 02:16 pm (UTC)Re: IT IS SO SIMPLE
Date: 2006-05-12 02:36 pm (UTC)Re: IT IS SO SIMPLE
Date: 2006-05-12 02:40 pm (UTC)Re: IT IS SO SIMPLE
Date: 2006-05-12 02:44 pm (UTC)