Looks me in the eye when he shoots
Apr. 28th, 2006 10:50 amWeirdly voting has now completely collapsed for "Teardrop" - v.odd.
A hard song to listen to: "Johnny Reggae" by The Piglets. How come it wasn't banned? This is kind of what I was talking about w.r.t Vanilla on the poll the other day - wrong, off, but in a vigorous way.
Unguilty pleasures (again): getting buzzed on authenticity and punkiness etc. *is* - or can be - a wicked pop pleasure, can't it?* As long as there's something rousing in the mix, anyway, so "yes!" to flag-waving U2, "no" to solemn Dicky Ashcroft (your examples will hopefully vary). There's no attitude or position that can't provide some transient enjoyment. Is this "irony"? WHAT OF IT.
"Sonnet" has just come on the radio to prove me right (& punish me).
*cf Rock Dreams - the great rock stories work cos they're exciting and connective more than because they're 'true', but this is no reason to throw them out, just to enjoy them differently (more poppish-ly?)
I might - MIGHT - do the Madonna Canon today. *rolls up sleeves*
A hard song to listen to: "Johnny Reggae" by The Piglets. How come it wasn't banned? This is kind of what I was talking about w.r.t Vanilla on the poll the other day - wrong, off, but in a vigorous way.
Unguilty pleasures (again): getting buzzed on authenticity and punkiness etc. *is* - or can be - a wicked pop pleasure, can't it?* As long as there's something rousing in the mix, anyway, so "yes!" to flag-waving U2, "no" to solemn Dicky Ashcroft (your examples will hopefully vary). There's no attitude or position that can't provide some transient enjoyment. Is this "irony"? WHAT OF IT.
"Sonnet" has just come on the radio to prove me right (& punish me).
*cf Rock Dreams - the great rock stories work cos they're exciting and connective more than because they're 'true', but this is no reason to throw them out, just to enjoy them differently (more poppish-ly?)
I might - MIGHT - do the Madonna Canon today. *rolls up sleeves*
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 10:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 10:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 11:57 am (UTC)1) execrable lyrics
2) relentlessly dull guitar stodge
3) even worse than the enforced fun i referenced yesterday, enforced patriotism
4) we all know how much i hate laddishness
5) and football
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:08 pm (UTC)I forgot to mention to most important and obvious reason why the song is detestable in any case. BADDIEL AND SKINNER = INDEFENSIBLE.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:11 pm (UTC)Three Lions - "football's coming home" refers largely to the tournament being held in the UK, with a tangential "and we hope we win it" meaning.
Three Lions 98 - the tournament is in France, so "football's coming home" is about the expectation of bringing back the trophy, i.e. more triumphalist (also the performances in Euro 96 and between that and the 98 world cup had been more encouraging)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:17 pm (UTC)"Football's coming home" with regard to a football tournament in my country would fill me with DREAD more than anything else, I am 99% certain that Three Lions is not a good song but even if it was it would be completely tainted by association for me.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:22 pm (UTC)(i had an argt w.GUY BECKETT of old-old-skool ilm abt this very topic and he "left"* immediately after) = did i win or did i lose :(
*(also known as "didn't come back for three years")
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:04 pm (UTC)i think you...won! (i have never heard of guy beckett before.)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:47 pm (UTC)In England, funnily enough. Perhaps it was a lot more absorbing if one was living within a 10 mile radius of Wembley Stadium.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:54 pm (UTC)It was held all over the country! But it was most inescapable in London.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-28 01:00 pm (UTC)CHECK THE MEANING
Date: 2006-04-28 11:29 am (UTC)Re: CHECK THE MEANING
Date: 2006-04-28 11:35 am (UTC)Re: CHECK THE MEANING
Date: 2006-04-28 11:56 am (UTC)