AROOOO! AROOOO! GOTH ALERT! Yes, it's Now: The Placebo Years, or Now: 1997 as you might otherwise call it. I remember this as a deeply fallow time for pop but then I was living back at my parents' house, working sub-minimum wage (OK there was no minimum wage back then) and listening to EARLY MANICS records. Oh to be 23 again (not in a grillion years). Other new faces include Mansun, Sash and the Chemical Brothers. And TEH FIRST EVER INTERWEB NUMBER ONE. Well, it was if you were reading USENET.
Now 35 saw the Spice Girls triumph at the second time of asking, "Say You'll Be There" beating Pulp into a close-ish second, with Suede, the Pet Shop Boys and Undiesworld tying for third. It also saw a sudden dip in the number of people voting, probably because they were all on holiday, or because the late-90s were rub. But they weren't really, where they? Were they??!!
[Poll #708236]
VOTE ME GOOD!
Now 35 saw the Spice Girls triumph at the second time of asking, "Say You'll Be There" beating Pulp into a close-ish second, with Suede, the Pet Shop Boys and Undiesworld tying for third. It also saw a sudden dip in the number of people voting, probably because they were all on holiday, or because the late-90s were rub. But they weren't really, where they? Were they??!!
[Poll #708236]
VOTE ME GOOD!
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:15 pm (UTC)(the right formula I think would be a Spicesque 'from-nowhere' emergence: I think the reaction against 'manufactured pop' which led us to this wasteland of Bluntian acoustica and Britpop redux was v much triggered by the rash of Pop Idol programmes, cf oft-repeated assertion that "they don't produce artists with PROPER, LONG careers" despite it being patently not true!)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:36 pm (UTC)(ps what are your sparesonic youth LPs: can i have em?)
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:54 pm (UTC)