Come back Simon Reynolds all is forgiven
Dec. 2nd, 2009 02:34 pmCome the 21st century, however, and the mainstream began to congeal into a certain beige perma-blandness, neither soulful or soulless, semi-tasteful, efficient pop fare made by capable, acceptable sorts, a music rich in everything but inspiration.
Oh good grief...
Oh good grief...
Old man says 'kids these days wot r they like'
Date: 2009-12-02 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:02 pm (UTC)ps ADORNO ON A POGO-STICK!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:05 pm (UTC)Don't really see what the deal is with willing necrophilia towards decade's end - the death of XYZ - on the part of fortysomething Oxbridge music punters though, yours sincerely, fortysomething Oxbridge music punter ahem.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:11 pm (UTC)"it were all FACTORY round here when i was a lad"
Date: 2009-12-02 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:15 pm (UTC)That article would appear to be a masterclass in the art of leaving out the inconvenient bits that don't fit the argument.
"it were all HOUSE round here when I was a lad"
Date: 2009-12-02 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:19 pm (UTC)http://pitchfork.com/features/poptimist/6716-poptimist-9/
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:24 pm (UTC)The death of polka? Has no one heard "Must Be Santa"?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:35 pm (UTC)Pop is great now, pop is always great because music is always great. Of course, it depends on what you call 'pop' I suppose...
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:31 pm (UTC)"how you can write an article like that and not even get anywhere near to the real story of the decade i have no idea - that it's not any genre that's dying, it's the music industry, and that the tabloidism and default to conservatism of pop recently is a consequence of that."
no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:41 pm (UTC)fnar
Date: 2009-12-02 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-02 11:31 pm (UTC)And I ADORE post-punk pop sensibilities - give me 1982 any day you like. But using those acts as lazy flag-waving, balustrade-storming battering rams (mixed metaphors ftw) against young persons' chart music is borderline insulting - it's not as if music journalists at the time weren't making the same argument Stubbs is *about* ABC, Heaven 17, Soft Cell, blah blah zzzz! His presentism is very nearly astounding.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-03 12:10 am (UTC)Phew, I'm glad that all of those artists listed together like that after the word "flavourlessness" explains itself.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-03 01:30 am (UTC)Yes, I see exactly how that applies to everyone on that list who is not Eminem or the Cheeky Girls. Why do people who demonstrably have no interest whatsoever in a subject find reasons to write at length about it?
I mean, yes, there's an argument to be made about the ways in which pop might homogenize or worsen or any number of negative things that I wouldn't necessarily dismiss out of hand over the course of a decade. But in order to figure that out you'd probably have to listen to some of it first.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-03 02:45 pm (UTC)Visibility? Profile? Money?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-03 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-03 04:40 pm (UTC)Best film? The Godfather