[identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] poptimists
As Wu-Tang Clan producer Robert "RZA" Diggs notes in the promotional bumf accompanying the rap collective's fifth album, hip-hop is in dire straits. In the US, its stock has tumbled to the point that its primary function seems to have become the production of hits based around novelty dances: the chicken noodle soup, the krumping clown dance, the Aunt Jackie. This is the genre once known as the Black CNN reduced to the level of Black Lace's Agadoo.

From today's Guardian.

  • Obviously this is the frame for his argument, i.e. AP has to raise the stakes in order to turn a mundane album review into a 'state of modern culture' think piece.
  • The rapper said it, so it must be true. Huh? Hasn't the 'hip hop is dead' line been used to sell pretty much every big hip-hop album for the last few years? Why not analyse that instead?
  • 'primary function'? Wow, you mean the primary function of a type of music is to make people dance?
  • But the real issue I have is with 'reduced to the level of'.  So things change, and the ways things change might involve new patterns  of visibility, different musical 'product', and I'm sure the way people use or respond to Agadoo is different to the way they do 36 Chambers. Yet as soon as you say 'level' you place yourself in the position of the person who grades the levels. Your style implies an alignment of your judgement with my judgement, a consensus world in which we all agree to look down on the schoolkids youtubing their dancing and the wedding disco DJs. (But this position is the editorial style of the paper in general, so meh whatever).
  • WILL THIS SORT OF SILLINESS EVER GO AWAY? Or will I just learn not to get irritated by it?

Date: 2007-12-07 09:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lastclearchance.livejournal.com
I think in this case the artist's conception of and approach to hip-hop informs the art and therefore is worth mentioning in the review. Notably Raekwon and Ghostface among others within Wu-Tang resisted the direction RZA was taking Wu-Tang with this record. (As far as I understand, they think that the group has lost much of its populist sound and appeal and is retreating further and further into "art-rap". So maybe it's heartening to see challenges within the group?)

I wonder what the actual press packet quote is. Wu-Tang was certainly always aiming for something they thought was "deeper" than what has now become youtube rap, but I never equated them with the "black CNN" idea, which predates them (and which would be a better point of reference for Nas in his use of the same argument). Not to mention that the list of dances includes two from New York and one from LA, completely excluding the South from discussion (which is pretty significant when one is making this argument--not only are the dance-rappers denigrated, but the most popular among them are excluded from the discussion).

But I also think that "this sort of silliness," while it will always exist, is having a last gasp of prominence within hip-hop, largely from older acts who came up listening to the rap-as-movement music they champion (and claim to be making). An underground vs. mainstream false dichotomy will continue to exist, and false high- vs. low-culture lines will continue to be drawn, but calling a rapper a "conscious" rapper is sort of a backhanded descriptor, so while this type of argument will continue to manifest itself, it won't reflect this weird "politics vs. dancing" idea.

Date: 2007-12-07 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenith.livejournal.com
I don't think that sort of silliness will ever go away in the Guardian - they've done it with artists far more "mainstream" than the RZA (pretty much EVERY r&b/rap interview or positive review says that the singular artist in question is good and the rest of the genre is shit, without really explaining the points of difference). It will never stop annoying me, but I've stopped being annoyed by artists I like being quoted on it, unless they say something really specifically irritating. I've kind of accepted that, as someone said years ago when we used the term, "all pop stars are rockists" - that is to say, all of them will say that their own stuff has meaning and is authentic and so on. It's not the job of the artist to comment intelligently on the genre (except in their sound!): it's fine for them to just say "they're all shit, I'm great!" It's the job of the critic to look at the wider picture and see past that.

ted turner is the white ll cool j

Date: 2007-12-07 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com
for me (mr "politics of form" or in this case format), the great crashing wtf here is:
i. hullo i am a guardian critic
ii. my opinion of the actual real WHITE cnn is therefore [insert fairly guessable opinion of rolling tabloid tv news station]
iii. ???
iv. "look at pasty me i'm down with the clan"

Date: 2007-12-07 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
I've heard the new Wu-Tang and while it's by no means a bad record it's not as good as Chicken Noodle Soup, Watch My Feet, Soulja Boy etc etc. It's also not as good as the silliest danciest Wu Tang track ("Gravel Pit"). It's definitely a record that I'll like the more goes I give it, so maybe it'll come to overtake Soulja etc - but I doubt it.

Date: 2007-12-07 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chezghost.livejournal.com
'the Wu-Tang have never done CNN-ey stuff anyway'

the videos for Triumph and I Can't Go To Sleep do actually have a strong element of this in them i would say but i guess they may be exceptions to the norm.

People love 36 Chambers so much because it's got a similar weighty worthiness and visceral aggression to the PE albums whilst being a recognisable shift from that production-wise and conceptually, i thought. but i can't help but think of the first Wu-tang album as more melancholic and dour than the PE stuff which always sounded angrier, funkier, maybe even funnier (ODB aside).

Date: 2007-12-07 04:31 pm (UTC)
koganbot: (Default)
From: [personal profile] koganbot
I have never heard "Agadoo," much less danced to it!

(To answer your question, no this type of bad argument will not go away for a long time, if ever, but unfortunately or fortunately [note ambivalence] it is not silly; it contains the very potent idea that the writer and reader have the strong potential to be phony and must be ever vigilant in their tastes not to fall for the fake.)

Date: 2007-12-08 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mooxyjoo.livejournal.com
johann strauss

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 03:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios