Date: 2007-11-13 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bengraham.livejournal.com
Is that the actual cover? I like it a lot.

Date: 2007-11-13 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jauntyalan.livejournal.com
when's it really out? graun review was past friday, which usually means i should be able to get it now

Date: 2007-11-13 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com
Not 100% sure about Sarah's choice of eyeshadow there but yes, definite improvement :)

Date: 2007-11-13 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
well I liked the other one, but this is grebt too

Date: 2007-11-13 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
it screams 80s 12" single sleeve to me actually

Date: 2007-11-13 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com
i quite like it, although jeff is right about 12" single sleeve

Date: 2007-11-13 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com
Yes! It's the font I think. I'm thinking Journeys To Glory era Spandau, or Ultravox's "Hymn"

Date: 2007-11-13 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hoshuteki.livejournal.com
Nicola doesn't seem to be quite so 'tangled up' on that cover...

Date: 2007-11-13 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jauntyalan.livejournal.com
and i think some new order stuff (but i might be imagining it)

Date: 2007-11-13 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com
it's the Bondage, Up Yours version of late-90s George Michael artwork...

Spandau was exactly who I was thinking of

Date: 2007-11-13 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com
e.g.
http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?what=R&obid=956205

Date: 2007-11-13 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epicharmus.livejournal.com
It *is*, isn't it? Though GA's attire (while correctly androgynous) is a little too spartan for the era. Still, magnificent.

LOVE the color-coding via eyeshadow thing.

Date: 2007-11-13 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Only because the baseline was set so low! I think this looks really cheap, just not quite as nondescript as the mass market version.

Date: 2007-11-13 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mostlyconnect.livejournal.com
I think it would totally miss the point for a Girls Aloud album to look 'expensive'? I would like to argue about this!

Date: 2007-11-13 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
OK, a certain accessibility is part of their charm. But there's a world of difference between not looking unattainable, and looking cheap and trashy in a bad way.

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 08:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios