ext_281244 ([identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] poptimists2007-09-18 10:20 am
Entry tags:

A Year In Pop: 37

Hello clouds hello sky hello elvis reissues, I'm back in the "saddle" (thanx to [livejournal.com profile] piratemoggy for her excellent work) and ready to tick. Just one question - what is Phil Collins doing here?

[Poll #1057109]

EDIT: THE HI TACK SONG IS "LET'S DANCE" NOT "SAY SAY SAY". THOUGH IF YOU HATED ONE YOU'RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO TICK THE OTHER I GUESS. IDIOT ME.

[identity profile] ninebelow.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 09:42 am (UTC)(link)
It's quite frightening but also pretty interesting: the power of suggestion coupled with the immediacy of technology. In the future the Christmas number one might not be the cunningly crafted ballad released as single but what ever plays over the credits of the big film that everyone in the country watches after Christmas dinner. Likewise whatever plays over the montage they use after the World Cup final. Record pluggers will start trying to nobble TV production assistants rather than Radio 1 DJs.

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 10:28 am (UTC)(link)
The difference between this ad and many others is that it's a 90" advert, giving much longer exposure to the music. Plus the music is a key element of the ad's structure, and not just incidental. And it's been heavily written about in the tabloids too. They've also been placing it in high profile places - such as the Big Brother final, rugby world cup matches and so on - that give massive exposure and also reaching people when they are likely to be watching in bigger groups, giving it more talkability too.

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 10:36 am (UTC)(link)
The Bonnie Tyler Total Eclipse of the Heart one is the only one I've seen that actually works properly in terms of having the same build-up (although still not as good as the Phil Collins one)

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I hadn't seen that one, yeah, it is quite different.

[identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 09:53 am (UTC)(link)
I guess I'm just surprised that people are so open to the power of suggestion - for whatever reason buying something you hear as the credits of a film roll makes a lot more sense to me than buying something you hear on a fucking CHOCOLATE ADVERT. I dunno, I have a real hatred of TV adverts - they were totally frowned upon in the house when I was growing up, the TV was always muted when they were on, and I still do that myself.

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2007-09-18 10:34 am (UTC)(link)
I don' think it's just the power of suggestion - the whole advert is based around the dramatic build-up of the song, and when you see it the first time, it's so unusual compared to most TV ads, you really pay attention, and I think it's reminded people how good the song is.

(I saw this first hand when I happened to be in a pub showing the rugby the other day; normally everyone just talks through the ad breaks but in this case the whole pub stopped and watched and started talking about it.)

[identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com 2007-09-23 08:35 am (UTC)(link)
This is also working for Feist's "One Two Three Four" apparently - buzz from iPod ads (although I've never seen one)