Date: 2007-03-10 02:37 pm (UTC)
i think the idea of DIRECTION is kind of key -- but it reflects a sort of "auterist" assumption

ie we object more to a bad direction per se when we assume an act is likely to "know where they're heading"; an act we assume not much in control of its own destiny is forgiven a bad direction (though it may be instead despised for being a willing and/or silly "puppet" of forces beyond its control)

i enjoy lex's inversion of rockist auteurism -- ie when he says "why would someone WANT to sound like this?"; viz yes they are in control of their destiny but SO WHAT WHAT IF THEY PUT IT TO SUCH POOR PURPOSE!

(one element of "had to be there" is that now-pervasive templates may not AT THAT TIME have been laid down -- viz we can still strongly remember when something turned out much less than open seemed so at the time; seemed to be promising to go onto a brave future than in the event never arrived... but we can invoke the potential where the weren't-theres haven't a hope

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2014

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 12:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios