Public Carmodism
Feb. 1st, 2007 05:23 pmDiscussion on the tournament thread about GHOST TOWNE by the Specials - is this the biggest example of Carmodism being generally accepted and written into the executive summary of rock history?
(Definition of Carmodism for the 99% of you who won't know what I'm on about: the belief that the state of the charts reflects the state of the nation, or at least the belief that it makes for more interesting analysis to pretend it does. From Robin Carmody, cultural critic and high practitioner of the art.)
(Definition of Carmodism for the 99% of you who won't know what I'm on about: the belief that the state of the charts reflects the state of the nation, or at least the belief that it makes for more interesting analysis to pretend it does. From Robin Carmody, cultural critic and high practitioner of the art.)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:32 pm (UTC)As with many -isms there is a lot of vagueness to work through here!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:46 pm (UTC)"God Save" was written with foreknowledge that there was a Jubilee coming up. (And "Three Lions" in foreknowledge that there was Euro 96 on the way.)
That's the distinction I want to make. The former is a song becoming linked to events by coincidence (or psychic affiliation). The latter is a song muscling into and transforming or setting the tone of an event - which is also fascinating, of course!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 06:12 pm (UTC)I guess what I'm interested in on this thread isn't the impact on the mood of the nation (I don't believe unintended impact is more authentic than intended, either), but the way a critical story (or Hero Story - am I using that right?) builds up around the record. And the stories are different depending on the intention.
What interests me about "Ghost Town" is that the Carmodic interpretation - Ghost Town is great because it reflected the riots - has become so accepted: I'd guess the majority of critical writing on GT tells or references that story. I'm interested in other songs where those kind of interpretations do or don't become part of the story of the song.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 07:12 pm (UTC)Is there a "you had to be there" aspect to 'Ghost Town's appeal?
I am really sceptical about Carmodism, I don't believe particularly in "states of the nation" (always written in retrospect, by people mapping their own perceived sense of collective on to others who may or may not have shared it, and who for whatever reason aren't involved in the writing of history). In the past, oh, 10 years, only two events even stand out as even being considerable for State Of The Nation status - Dianadeath and 7/7. The first - I didn't feel anything and neither, I suspect, did most people here. The second - I felt it but I was on the spot. And I left London the weekend after, and (fairly obviously) the "state" of Brighton was v different from the "state" of London. "State of the nation" is a means of exclusion, while pretending it's about inclusion.
And I don't really believe any one song is big enough to capture any putative state of the nation in any case. Unless it actively tries to, in which case that will make it irritating.
Plus, like Frank, I place more importance on people's personal lives.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 09:23 pm (UTC)full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-01 10:34 pm (UTC)i. every record in the charts (inc.its placement) is a snapshot of the "state of the nation" in a fairly particular way, this being an analogue of the way that ---
ii. --- every by-election is a snapshot of the "state of the nation"
so there is a double-grid of reference, for starters (you have to recall that robin seems to have an exact map of the blue-red-yellow colouring of EVERY SINGLE UK POLITICAL CONSTITUENCY since the 1940s, as well as the names of successful AND defeated politicians, and which sector of the party they are fitted into, in class and policy terms) (and more impalpable things, like the meaning of the lure of a given cultural influence) (ie what did it mean to be attracted to americanism in 1957, 1967, 1986, 2007)
so his snapshots jigsaw together to present a complex history of flows and surges and shifts and changes -- and the two grids of refence TAKEN TOGETHER highlight subtle stuff going on in each separate grid, that wouldn't otherwise be visible necessarily
what makes it so fascinating is that he basically takes the idea that "music reflects society" as the given: and follows through in genuinely astonishing detail -- to such a degree that you do become very alert to that aspect of music which relates to affirmation of (broad) cultural-political allegience
i don't think it matters that it isn't the only thing a song's about -- it's part of what a song's about; it's not not there
(in ref lex's point abt personal lives -- people's politics is very much part of their personal lives, and Carmodism is an examination of exactly that, the personal and half-expressed dynamic within public discussion) (robin also has a very strong judgemental layer, in regard to right and wrong politics -- this you don't have to agree with at all to learn from it as a method; besides, who the hell wd commit himself to his degree of knowledge of local political minutiae if they didn't care a lot abt politics in terms of what should and shouldn't happen?)
Re: full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-01 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 10:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 01:33 am (UTC)Green Day / American Idiot
Date: 2007-02-02 09:26 am (UTC)I know a rockist when I see one
Date: 2007-02-02 09:33 am (UTC)*But Dammers was totally political, wasn't he, so "unintended" doesn't the right word here. But I'm nitpicking, so just ignore me.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-02 12:04 pm (UTC)I haven't read a single broadsheet article about acid house that doesn't explicitly put it up against the backdrop of the late Thatcher government and this is usually the record they pick.
Re: full-on carmodism... teenpop 1965
Date: 2007-02-02 05:13 pm (UTC)But this points up a confusion I got from the way that Tom worded the question: to say that state of the charts reflects state of the nation is not the same as to say that a particular song reflects the state of the nation. And to say that songs and charts occur on a sociopolitical landscape (which is probably the real point to be made) doesn't imply that either a song or a chart will reflect that landscape as a whole, esp. given that the landscape isn't a steady state but rather a land of conflicts and tensions. And the same song can be used differently by different people: e.g., "We Gotta Get Out Of This Place" being played in a working-class pub and being played to screaming American teens and being played on a portable tape player by a G.I. in Vietnam and being played by a pickup band of high-school students at a summer camp I attended in 1966 and being played (on piano?) by two middle-class New York Jews as they were composing the thing.
Re: full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-02 05:26 pm (UTC)Re: full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-02 05:43 pm (UTC)There's A Riot Goin' On
Date: 2007-02-02 05:54 pm (UTC)Re: full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-03 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 12:10 am (UTC)I'll post a few more things here in a moment (ah, egotistical googling).
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 12:32 am (UTC)I don't think, though, that the actual chart singles *of the time of her death* can be related to her or her death in any way; by 1997, "Diana music" had been in decline for some years, its place largely taken by what you might call "Blair music", namely Oasis and their followers, the music which represented the dilution of what had been vaguely called "indie"/"alternative" which I see as analoguous to the dilution of the Labour Party (like many Carmodic ideas, this was in fact first stated by someone else; I vividly remember Simon Price drawing the analogy in Melody Maker just before the 1997 election). But despite the disconnection between her and the driving forces in chartpop by the time of her death, she's an absolutely key figure in the change in what pop is, relative to the "official culture" ("state of the nation" *is* a means of exclusion of dissenters; that's precisely why I find it interesting, to analyse precisely why there is a desire to see certain people excluded). I wouldn't rule out the possibility that had we had unswervingly traditional young aristocratic women marrying into the royal family during the 1980s, people who ignored pop culture altogether and were happy to hunt, shoot and fish, we might not have James Blunt et al now ... but then the fact that we had Diana rather than a stereotypical Country Life "girl in pearls" is for me basically a result of Thatcherism (and I also see Diana as an analogy for the drift of Thatcherism from pretty much unbridled neo-feudalism to an unprecendented radical-reactionary hybrid - "radical-reactionary" is Sinker again, sorry - and the ideological confusion and breakup of the British Right since the Leaderene fell; c.f. my Flambards piece passim).
Part of Carmodism is undoubtedly a result of my Asperger's Syndrome; in other words intellectualisation of everything and an immense difficulty in relating to people as people or in terms of their personal lives. But also it's a result of my loathing for the cultural and intellectual compartmentalism which is so dominant in Britain, now the most baneful legacy of the old class system (which in practice has now been largely replaced by an American class system, i.e. something about finance rather than culture, and has been twisted around by time so much that, as I once got into a *lot* of trouble for suggesting, the hard Left are in some ways the last High Tories in terms of their belief in who "should" and "shouldn't" do certain things; that may be a Blair/Reid belief, but there's a grain of truth in it). I may be wrong, but I don't think there'd be anything like as much wariness of my way of seeing things if I was French and was debating them mainly with French people.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-11 01:27 am (UTC)To get back to the original subject, I'd hardly call the most widespread interpretation of "Ghost Town" Carmodistic, in that it was around - and very much the norm - long before I started doing this. I think it's just *blindingly obvious* in that case (and of course there's other stuff it can be analogised with; Charles and Diana as Official Distraction). It's one of the few cases where a connection is so clear as to overpower the usual residual impact of Great British Compartmentalism.
Re: full-on carmodism...
Date: 2007-02-11 02:31 am (UTC)My adoption of that approach for my chartblogging - which itself started in response to what Marcello Carlin was doing on ILM, just lifting the charts from a similarly-conceived show on a different station - was born out of a frustration with my early pieces in such a vein, which (like much of my work at the time) were in the shadow of an icon, in this case Marcello himself. I knew there was potential in what I was doing, but I felt I was merely a pale imitation without the life experience; hence all the constant references to "The Other" and the like. So it was basically a means of stepping out of Marcello's shadow, and finding my voice (something which you said happened to you when you wrote a Wire piece on The Fall at, interestingly, pretty much the age I am now). It's something that nobody else is doing; it gets lonely, but it's more satisfying that simply parroting what is already said (there is a narrow set of Received Wisdom which is pretty much the closest thing to "Public Carmodism" in widespread currency - the Beatles representing Escape From The Fifties, the Pistols as rebellion against stagflation, Stock Aitken Waterman embodying a set of 80s values, but crucially probably not referring to those ideas as "aggressive individualism" as I do - and I try to avoid that stuff, and concentrate on rarer tributaries: the old shire order already being threatened as early as 1959 by the calm, *ordered* perfect life (as opposed to the bumbling *ostentatious unprofessionalism* of shire Toryism) of "Living Doll", or USING OTHER IDEAS PLEASE re. "Relax" and putting it in the context of John Betjeman's death between its twin peaks and Mike Read's simplistic, Mail-esque appropriation of JB). I don't see it as definitive or absolute; I just see it as something that might be interesting to do (perhaps now more than 20 years ago precisely because what remains of the music press has been locked in self-perpetuating, simultaneously aggressive and hermetic, "rock'n'roll" cliches for so long; back then, the Monitor clique at MM could be seen as anti-political when in fact they acknowledged pop's interactions with the wider world far more than any print hacks in at least the last 10 years have dreamed of; they usually still pretend that hating the old anti-pop establishment is still the most rebellious thing in the world because anything else would involve asking serious questions about both pop's role and their own position, and that is more than their life's worth).
I might be too judgemental these days, compared to when I was on ILM, but these are desperate times, and you have to redefine yourself for the climate and atmosphere and threats surrounding you, and my writings are *far* more balanced than I can sometimes be offline (I don't, usually, snap online like I used to).