ext_88055 (
katstevens.livejournal.com
) wrote in
poptimists
2007
-
08
-
22
11:40 am
Don't cha?
[
Poll #1043267
]
Let's see which direction the Poptimist compass is pointing!
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:06 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Check the weekly tracks chart and die inside!
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
jauntyalan.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:15 am (UTC)
(
link
)
one more play than Nicole S/aly &AJ. same number as MIA-Jimmy. no biggy - it's in the top 5 - it's on Now 67. that's poptimism for you.
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
alexmacpherson.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:21 am (UTC)
(
link
)
So why aren't Kanye/Fergie/Timbaland in the poptimists top 5 then? Tying poptimism to the top 10 is too easy and open to too much shit. like Nash.
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
freakytigger.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:22 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh it's only the tracks chart, hardly counts rly - still good Judge Pop material tho I agree.
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
jauntyalan.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
yeah, ppl are actually playing more stuff by Rihanna, Robyn, MIA, Tori Amos, but the Kate Nash tracks are not split, cos she has just the one song.
(We can give the high placing of B&S a bye cos of the sinister birthday. er ??)
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
freakytigger.livejournal.com
2007-08-22 11:43 am (UTC)
(
link
)
B&S are perennial top-5s in the artists chart - they're comfort food for a lot of Poptimists because of the community's ancestry I guess!
64 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
Re: INDEFENSIBLE:
(We can give the high placing of B&S a bye cos of the sinister birthday. er ??)
Re: INDEFENSIBLE: