ext_281244 ([identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] poptimists2008-03-28 11:12 am

Just to make the same link come up 3 times a row on my friendslist

Lex interviews Estelle - and the 'racist music industry' argument gets into the main news section too. IN YR BROADSHEETS SETTING YR AGENDA.

The opening bit of the interview reads - probably unintentionally - like classic Morleyan entrapment though: get Estelle to rant about how Adele ain't soul and she can't tell me what soul is, then ask Estelle what soul is and get staggeringly vague answer.

[identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com 2008-03-28 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I toyed with putting the Amy thing in but thought, you know, fuck it: Estelle doesn't need her words qualified by stuff like that, and it wasn't so much a discussion as just Estelle going, oh I think Amy's amazing.

The trouble is once you start ACTUALLY USING words like 'black' and 'white' you end up having to qualify and double-qualify everything you say; it'd be a good candidate for a stand-alone column but in a piece with the focus on a specific person, there just wasn't room.

[identity profile] infov0re.livejournal.com 2008-03-28 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, yeah, I understand wrt space/focus - it's an interview, not a column. I was more thinking about jumping off points that weren't what the majority of blog/forum traffic is going to pick up on. It's still a good article either way.

[identity profile] alexmacpherson.livejournal.com 2008-03-28 12:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Also I don't get the feeling that if I had included the one line "I think Amy W's amazing though", it would have stopped any of the complainants from misreading or just not reading or whatever they're doing.