ext_281244 (
freakytigger.livejournal.com) wrote in
poptimists2007-03-13 01:09 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Another little poll
This one isn't for work!
[Poll #945719]
I'm using "MP3" to mean any kind of downloadable audio format. Also, there is a fifth question, which needs more than a text box probably, and it is this: What if anything changes in your writing when your readers can hear the subject of it immediately?
[Poll #945719]
I'm using "MP3" to mean any kind of downloadable audio format. Also, there is a fifth question, which needs more than a text box probably, and it is this: What if anything changes in your writing when your readers can hear the subject of it immediately?
no subject
You know, I don't know if I have the frame of reference to answer this well. I've been working in that template for a really long time, and basically learned how to be a music critic within that format. When I'm writing regular reviews for other publications, I think I just assume less about the audience knows, but that's more to do with who I think my audience is -- ie, people who already know a lot, and I can get away with being a bit obscure or informal because most people will be on the same page, or at least in the same chapter.
no subject
no subject
Plus if, the song is not right there to be downloaded, if the author actually likes it, wouldn't they try to sell it harder. It's much more effect to go find the song/album (or even gasp! go out and buy it) than simply right click.
no subject