ext_28690 ([identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] poptimists2006-08-03 10:44 am

Guilty Pleasures

I was looking att he latest issue of Q yesterday int he library and reading through their list of '50 Guiltiest Pleasures'. And it got me to thinking - is the idea of a 'guilty pleasure' inherently rockist? Most of the songs I 'like but shouldn't like' are songs I wouldn't normally listen to except because of association/nostalgic reasons because they're a bit rubbish. But not liking ELO's Living Thing just because the rock canon doesn't like them? And don't even get me started on Macarthur Park...

So does poptimism recognise the concept of the guilty pleasure, or - as it should be - music is music and whether it's the gaspings of a tortured soul or the wall of sound rebuilt in Duplo, what matters is whether it's ANY GOOD AT ALL?

There should be a poll on this, maybe, but I don't have the issue to hand.

[identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I dislike that people use the term in the first place and/or get worked up about hipsters. Get some perspective.

(um, this is not a go at you, mippy)

[identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
What I meant to say is I don't find the term remotely useful. It tells me nothing about the person or their views. Smacks to me of a playground insult or a US high school stereotype.

[identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com 2006-08-04 01:09 pm (UTC)(link)
That's not how the term is used on the interweb, though, is it? In music discussions on the interweb, at least. Simply liking certain records can be dubbed hipsterism (= moronic, from where I sit, no more useful than dubbing something a "guilty pleasure").