ext_28690 ([identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] poptimists2006-08-03 10:44 am

Guilty Pleasures

I was looking att he latest issue of Q yesterday int he library and reading through their list of '50 Guiltiest Pleasures'. And it got me to thinking - is the idea of a 'guilty pleasure' inherently rockist? Most of the songs I 'like but shouldn't like' are songs I wouldn't normally listen to except because of association/nostalgic reasons because they're a bit rubbish. But not liking ELO's Living Thing just because the rock canon doesn't like them? And don't even get me started on Macarthur Park...

So does poptimism recognise the concept of the guilty pleasure, or - as it should be - music is music and whether it's the gaspings of a tortured soul or the wall of sound rebuilt in Duplo, what matters is whether it's ANY GOOD AT ALL?

There should be a poll on this, maybe, but I don't have the issue to hand.

[identity profile] blue-russian.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
the funny thing, though, is that because the 'guilt' is totally personal, by definition there shouldn't be a "guilty pleasures canon." the disco or 80s pop or whatever that I lived through and though was incredibly uncool but may now love, is something that people in their 20s come to without social associations (well, with totally different ones anyway). how or why would the feel any guilt?

i also think is one of the reasons i enjoy listening to "foreign" music: i come at it totally without preconceptions.

[identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
I agree. Case study: I think I probably love Las Ketchup because I was quite isolated from 'Asereje' in the way that most of the populace clearly weren't, and as such never wrote them off as Holiday One Hit Wonders. Hence my utter joy at them entering Eurovision for Spain this year!