ext_28690 ([identity profile] mippy.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] poptimists2006-08-03 10:44 am

Guilty Pleasures

I was looking att he latest issue of Q yesterday int he library and reading through their list of '50 Guiltiest Pleasures'. And it got me to thinking - is the idea of a 'guilty pleasure' inherently rockist? Most of the songs I 'like but shouldn't like' are songs I wouldn't normally listen to except because of association/nostalgic reasons because they're a bit rubbish. But not liking ELO's Living Thing just because the rock canon doesn't like them? And don't even get me started on Macarthur Park...

So does poptimism recognise the concept of the guilty pleasure, or - as it should be - music is music and whether it's the gaspings of a tortured soul or the wall of sound rebuilt in Duplo, what matters is whether it's ANY GOOD AT ALL?

There should be a poll on this, maybe, but I don't have the issue to hand.

[identity profile] katstevens.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
I agree. Case study: I think I probably love Las Ketchup because I was quite isolated from 'Asereje' in the way that most of the populace clearly weren't, and as such never wrote them off as Holiday One Hit Wonders. Hence my utter joy at them entering Eurovision for Spain this year!

[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I could quite easily defend them.

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
Well that goes without saying, obviously.

[identity profile] freakytigger.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:01 am (UTC)(link)
[livejournal.com profile] sukrat is a kind of sister community to Poptimists, for talking about very unpop music.

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:08 am (UTC)(link)
He also helps fit that definition by being one of the most passionate advocates of certain songs that other members may have written off without proper listening.

[identity profile] byebyepride.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:20 am (UTC)(link)
Lex's rhetoric is Indie not poptimist i.e. he thinks music with guitars and boys is bad and shiny pop with girls and sex is good. But his practice may well be poptimist, since he clearly likes bits of both.

[identity profile] whalefish.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:21 am (UTC)(link)
People are saying c.f.! YAY!

[identity profile] whalefish.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:32 am (UTC)(link)
I find the whole guilty pleasures thing a bit confusing really - as if there is music that we're not meant to like, music that's illegal. Apparently I'm meant to be guilty about liking Jet (song, not band), Wired For Sound, Bat Out Of Hell...whyyy? They're good tunes! Especially Bat Out Of Hell!

I have to confess that I did originally listen to stuff like that because I found it funny, but eventually I realised that I enjoyed it because I liked it and thought it was good stuff. Same with a lot of current and current-ish pop music, really.

No such thing as...

[identity profile] giddyoldgoat.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
The film critic Robin Wood likes to say that there's no such thing as a guilty pleasure - ie it isn't pleasure if there's guilt involved

The magazine Film Comment used to run a 'Guilty Pleasures' column (I think it's where the term first caught on) which allowed toney auteurs and critics to admit that they liked all kinds of rub. When it came to John Waters, his 'guilty pleasures' were all art movies by Bresson, Bergman, Chantal Akkerman etc - END OF FEATURE

my guilty pleasures

[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
avant garde jazz
films where SUDDENLY NOTHING HAPPENS for 12 hours in a row
philosophy
TEH INTERWEBS

only posing if:

[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
the orange penguin you are reading is an actual live arctic bird

books (and biscuits): poptimist friendly

i am old enuff to remember when people looked down on PAPERBACKS as a vulgar attack on all culture

[identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 12:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I won a cassette of Jordan the Comeback when it was released back in, looks like 1990, and I really like that one. Plus I was familiar with some of their earlier stuff.

I tend not to hang with the light opera crowd. But I have a lot of friends who are into singing choral music and so on.

Re: my guilty pleasures

[identity profile] lockedintheatti.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I find avant garde jazz and certain forms of electronic listening music to be far more incomprehensible and indefensible than even Sandi Thom, James Blunt and Westlife. There's just so much pseudery going on with those.

Re: my guilty pleasures

[identity profile] dubdobdee.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe we react strongly against what we fear being implicated by:

viz "if i like this i will be thought guilty of naffness/pseudery/homopobia/being a bewigged p4edo"

[identity profile] awesomewells.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Lex is a total rockist in almost every conceivable way. Rhetorically he's as far away from being a poptimist as possible, especially with all this "Mariah Carey is a litmus test of poptimism" stuff.

[identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)
and for talking about very pop music that doesn't get a look in here, e.g. prog, easy listening

[identity profile] jeff-worrell.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I dislike that people use the term in the first place and/or get worked up about hipsters. Get some perspective.

(um, this is not a go at you, mippy)

[identity profile] carsmilesteve.livejournal.com 2006-08-03 01:33 pm (UTC)(link)
is there a possibility that what it's REALLY about is arguing though. back to ye olde "defend the indefensible" type threads. or at least that having a position that allows you/us to engage in argument (not even discussion) is more FUN than agreeing with everyone?

Page 3 of 4