2006-09-21

MOBOs

So Lemar wins Best UK Male AGAIN for the millionth time, beating Sway who was probably my favourite artist out of all the nominees last night. Bouncy got booed for not turning up, Rhianna sang like a drowning cat and Gina Yashere & Coolio gave Sam Fox & Mick Fleetwood a run for their money in the bad presenting stakes.

So, should the MOBOs be put out of their misery?

(Hurrah for Black Eyed Peas winning best group tho!)
Entry tags:

The History Of Jop Part 7 aka We're Rockers And Rappers United And Strong

The Pazz and Jop polls take us to the fairly unheralded year of 1985, and the selection is.....well, judge for yourself and discuss below. You get NINE votes, cast them wisely.

Notes: The John Fogerty song that got in last time rose to #3(!!) this time. It was excluded.

Never you mind the exit signs )

The Joptimists 1984 Vote Verdict:

1. Girls Just Wanna Have Fun (38 votes)
2. When Doves Cry (37 votes)
3. Jump (31)
4=. I Feel For You (28)
4=. Time After Time (28)
6. Let's Go Crazy (23)
7. What's Love Got To Do With It (21)
8. Dancing In The Dark (20)
9=. Free Nelson Mandela (19)
9=. Let's Hear It For The Boy (19)

morrissey = the new david byrne

ok usually when i do this kind of thing i frame the question fast and badly (or i wd never frame it at all) and [livejournal.com profile] koganbot becomes testy towards my fuzziness

but here is MY "explanation" of morrissey = he brought something to the boywing of britrock = called CAMP -- as in polari, as in an angry bitchy code against the UNSTYLISH USELESSNESS of the STRAIGHTS -- except that, since he wz militantly coy abt his sexuality (korrektly, as "coming out" would have stripped a powerful ambiguity out of what he wz doin), his camp was developed as a kind of MALE HET camp...

ANYWAY -- i have always bin ambivalent abt camp as an attitude (it's quickwitted and funny but it's also a compensatory attitude adopted by those who take themselves to be victims and are sniping secretly back...)

and given the shifts since the mid-80s in fashions in sexuality and within sexuality blah blah, i think morrissey's STYLE (sex! yes! but not for me...) reveals itself as a lot more reactionary a-and larkinesque than it did at the time

(again i feel i have not got at the nubbin of what i'm on about but have at it anyway)